Madras High Court
WP/41153/2026 of T.V.GEORGE Vs The District collector on 8 October 2026
WP No. 41153 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN
Writ Petition No. 41153 of 2026
and
WMP No. 46187 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA012312902026}
Mr.T.V.George
S/o Mr. Varunny
..Petitioner
Vs
1. The District collector
Coimbatore District.
2. The Commissioner
Valparai Municipality, Valparai,
Coimbatore District
..Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned notice dated 03.09.2026 bearing No. 103/ 2026 / 51
issued by the 2nd respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to consider the reply dated 11.09.2026 submitted by the petitioner, receive and consider the relevant statutory licences, certificates and connected documents produced by the petitioner, afford the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of hearing and thereafter proceed strictly in accordance with law and pass For Petitioner :
Mr.G.Kalidasan
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 04:22:48 pm )
2026:MHC:4243
WP No. 41153 of 2026
For Respondents :
Mr.R.Hashwanth
Government Advocate [R1]
Mr.B.Anand
Standing Counsel [R2]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The present writ petition has been instituted challenging the show cause notices issued under Section 145 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 (Amended in 2002). The competent authorities of the Municipality, during the inspection, identified construction of non-residential buildings / illegal usage of buildings and consequently issued show cause notice seeking explanations from the writ petitioner.
2. No writ against a show cause notice is maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India unless such show cause notice has been issued by an incompetent authority having no jurisdiction or tainted with allegation of malafides. The person receiving the show cause notice is expected to respond to the notice by submitting his written explanation along with the documents, if any. At the show cause notice stage, the high court cannot adjudicate the disputed facts relating to illegal usage of building or construction of non- residential building, unauthorised construction etc., These allegations are to be
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 04:22:48 pm )
2026:MHC:4243 WP No. 41153 of 2026
established by conducting inspection in the manner contemplated under law by the competent authorities. Therefore, entertaining a writ petition against the show cause notice is unnecessary and would cause prejudice to the enforcement authorities to enforce the law.
3. Mr.G.Kalidasan, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would contend that the impugned show cause notice is bereft of details. It does not contain the portion of unauthorised construction or illegal usage. In the absence of details, the impugned show cause notices are bad in law.
4. The arguments advanced by the learned counsel are neither candid nor convincing. In the event of furnishing all the details in a show cause notice, writ petition will be filed by stating that the authorities have pre determined the issue and on that ground it has to be quashed. If a show cause notice is issued calling explanation / details regarding the allegation of unauthorised building, then also they raise an objection that no details are available. It is not about giving details. On prima facie assessment or information, show cause notice has been issued and on receipt of building plan approval documents, licence etc., from the noticee, the authorities will be in a position to consider the issues on merits. What is required is to submit all relevant documents to prove the legality of the construction or usage of the building by the owner / occupier. Therefore, the contention that all details must be provided in the show cause notice is unacceptable.
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 04:22:48 pm )
2026:MHC:4243 WP No. 41153 of 2026
5. The subject properties fall within the territorial jurisdiction of Valparai Municipality, which is a hill station. Building constructions in hilly areas are regulated under Chapter X-A of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1992 (Tamil Nadu Act 48 of 1992). Section 217-A will apply exclusively to hill stations and the scheme under the said provision prohibits construction or re-construction of buildings etc., without licence under Section 217-B of the Act. Section 217-C speaks about application for licence. Section 217-D is for grant of licence. Section 217-O relates the chapter to override other laws.
6. Part II of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 also provides building regulation in hill stations. The present impugned notices have been issued under Section 145 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1995, which provides power to the authorities to stop work. Rule 26 of the Tamil Nadu Combined Development and Building Rules 2019 denotes applicability of other rules. Sub-rule (1) to Rule 26 states that, “Considering the ecological sensitiveness and need for conservation of the notified hill stations, the Tamil Nadu Hilly Areas Special Building Rules, 1981 and Tamil Nadu District Municipalities (Hill Stations) Building Rules, 1993 shall be in force.”
7. Therefore, the authorities are bound to grant permission by following
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 04:22:48 pm )
2026:MHC:4243 WP No. 41153 of 2026
the procedures contemplated under Chapter X-A of the District Municipalities Act, which exclusively deals with hill stations and also the building regulations in hill stations as contemplated under the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act. The authorities have to comply the laws to regulate the buildings in hill stations in order to protect the ecology in hill stations.
8. In the present case, writ petition has been filed challenging the show cause notice, which is not maintainable. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Municipality would submit that on receipt of explanation, the authorities will conduct field inspection and ascertain the unauthorised construction, illegal usage of the building by the owners / occupants and only thereafter proceed with enforcement actions as contemplated under the relevant Statutes and Rules in force.
9. In view of the above position, the writ petitioner is at liberty to submit his explanation along with the documents if any to the respondent Municipality within a period of seven (7) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such explanation, the respondent authority shall look into the same and thereafter take a decision to deal with the illegalities / irregularities in building construction in that locality in the manner known to law.
10. With the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 04:22:48 pm )
2026:MHC:4243 WP No. 41153 of 2026
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.R.V.,J.) 08-10-2026 Index: Yes Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes mp To
1. The District collector Coimbatore District.
2. The Commissioner Valparai Municipality, Valparai, Coimbatore District
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 04:22:48 pm )
2026:MHC:4243 WP No. 41153 of 2026
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN J. mp WP No. 41153 of 2026 08-10-2026
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 04:22:48 pm )