Madras High Court
WP(MD)/29097/2026 of Selvi T Vs The District Collector on 8 October 2026
WP(MD) No. 29097 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 08-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.D.SUMATHI
WP(MD) No. 29097 of 2026
and
W.M.P.(MD)No.22071 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011409082026}
Selvi T
W/o.Late.Thangavel
Valaivichettipatti
Sukkampatti Village
Vedasandur Taluk
Dindigul District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The District Collector
Dindigul District.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer
Dindigul District.
3. The Tahsildar
Vedasandhur Taluk
Dindigul District.
4. The Revenue Inspector
Ayyalur, Vedasandur Taluk
5. V.Muniyappan, Ex-President
Sukkampatti Panchayat
Vedasandhur Taluk
Dindigul District.
( Uploaded on: 16/10/2026 02:23:51 pm )
WP(MD) No. 29097 of 2026
6. M.L.Subramani, Ex-Vice President
Sukkampatti Panchayat
Vedasandhur Taluk
Dindigul District.
7. P.Subbulakshmi,
W/o.Pandian,
Door No. 3/399, Middle Street
Valavichetti Patti
Sukkampatti Panchayat
Vedasandhur Taluk
Dindigul District
..Respondent(s)
Prayer : Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 1st Respondent in Proceedings No.Na.Ka.No.2827898/2024/D2 dated 14.09.2026, quash the same as highly illegal, arbitrary, ultra vires, and without jurisdiction, and consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to regularize the petitioner’s possession and issue a house site patta in favour of the petitioner for the house and landed property situated at Door No. 3-338, New Natham Survey No.1727/11, Sukkampatti Village, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.R.S.Sivaram
For Respondent(s):
Mr.M.Kannan,
Special Government Pleader
for R-1 to R-4.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4.
( Uploaded on: 16/10/2026 02:23:51 pm )
WP(MD) No. 29097 of 2026
2. The order impugned in this writ petition before us is revisable. The petitioner’s counsel states that she will file a revision petition within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If such revision petition is filed, till the disposal of the same, the order impugned in the writ petition shall not be enforced. We have not gone into the merits of the matter. If the petitioner fails to file such revision petition, the benefit of this order will not be available to her. This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (G.R.S.,J.) (M.D.S.,J.) 08-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PMU
( Uploaded on: 16/10/2026 02:23:51 pm )
WP(MD) No. 29097 of 2026
To
1. The District Collector Dindigul District.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Dindigul District.
3. The Tahsildar Vedasandhur Taluk Dindigul District.
4. The Revenue Inspector Ayyalur, Vedasandur Taluk
( Uploaded on: 16/10/2026 02:23:51 pm )
WP(MD) No. 29097 of 2026
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND M.D.SUMATHI, J. PMU WP(MD) No. 29097 of 2026 08-10-2026
( Uploaded on: 16/10/2026 02:23:51 pm )