Madras High Court

WP(MD)/32219/2025 of R.Vishwanathan Vs The Secretary to Government on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 32219 of 2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 08-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

WP(MD) No. 32219 of 2025

CNR:{HCMD011611402025}

and

WMP(MD) Nos.25348 and 25351 of 2025

R.Vishwanathan

S/o.Ramasamy

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Secretary to Government,

Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Survey and Settlement Wing, SS-1(1) Section, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai.

3. The District Collector,

Dindigul District,

Collectorate Campus,

Dindigul.

4. The District Revenue Officer,

Dindigul District, Dindigul.

5. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Dindigul, Dindigul Disrict.

6. The Tahsildar

Dindigul West Taluk,

Dindigul District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to

WP(MD) No. 32219 of 2025

call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 24.09.2024 in proceedings bearing Proc.No.R3/6512424/2024 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same as being illegal and further direct the respondents to issue patta for the land in UDR S.No.118/1 (Old Natham S.No. 57/3 part) admeasuring about 28 cents situated at Annaipatti Village, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District in view of the G.O. (Ms.)

No. 808 dated 05.10.1998 and Circular No. R1/7699421/2024 dated 27.08.2024.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr. V.Kannan

For Respondent(s):

Mr.M.Dinesh Hari Sudarsan

Additional Government Pleader

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Challenging the order of the second respondent dated 24.09.2024, by way of which the second respondent had rejected the petitioner's application for issuance of natham patta, the petitioner is before this Court.

2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the material available on record.

3. The petitioner's claim for natham patta had been rejected on the ground that the lands were classified as “sarkar poramboke gramanatham'

WP(MD) No. 32219 of 2025 and also to satisfy the conditions prescribed in the circular issued dated 27.08.2024, the petitioner had not produced the original document.

4. The reasons for rejection had been attempted to be substantiated by the counter that has been filed in that regard. The learned Additional Government Pleader on the strength of the counter, would support the impugned order by contesting that the petitioner had only submitted an unregistered sale deed.

5. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, pointing out to the typed set of papers, would submit that the said document had been registered as Document No.1622/1995 on the file of the Sub-Registrar's Office-II, Dindigul. Further, the appeal filed by the petitioner would also indicate that a copy of the document along with the encumbrance certificate issued in that regard was also filed. If the encumbrance certificate had been verified, the second respondent could have indicated that the said document was a registered document and such exercise has not been carried out by him. In view of the above, this Court has no hesitation in setting aside the order impugned herein.

6. Accordingly, this Court allows this Writ Petition, sets aside the impugned order and remits the matter back to the second respondent to

WP(MD) No. 32219 of 2025 consider the case of the petitioner afresh and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law in consonance with the judgment of the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court in Kaman @ Kamatchi vs. The District Collector, Dindigul reported in 2026 (1) W.L.R. 321. The said exercise shall be carried out by the second respondent within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 08-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ABR

WP(MD) No. 32219 of 2025 To

1. The Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Survey and Settlement Wing, SS-1(1) Section, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai.

3. The District Collector, Dindigul District, Collectorate Campus, Dindigul.

4. The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul Disrict.

6. The Tahsildar Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District.

WP(MD) No. 32219 of 2025 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. ABR WP(MD) No. 32219 of 2025 08-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead