Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/22281/2026 of P. Arjunan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By In on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL OP(MD) No. 22281 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 07-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

CRL OP(MD) No. 22281 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011024072026}

P. Arjunan

S/o. Periyasamy,

Vathukara Street,

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1.The State Of Tamil Nadu,

Rep., by the Inspector Of Police,

Thottiyam Police station,

TiruchirappaIIi District,

Crime No. 88/2025.

2.M. Pradeep

S/o. Manogaran,

VOC Nagar,

Balasamuthiram,

..Respondent(s)

Prayer: C-51Q. To call for the records pertaining to the impugned charge sheet in S.C. No. 562 of 2025 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Trichy and quash the same.

For Petitioner(s):

N.SUDHAGAR NAGARAJ

For Respondent(s):

M/S. V. SHATHURTHI RAJA,

GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE (CRL SIDE)

FOR R1

Mr.A. GEORGE STEPHEN KANIKKAIRAJ

FOR R2

CRL OP(MD) No. 22281 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present petition has been filed by the accused in S.C.No.562 of 2025, on the file of the learned III Additional District and Sessions Court, Trichy, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein the petitioner is charged with the offences under Sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3), 109(1) of BNS, 2023.

2. A perusal of the charge sheet reveals that the accused person is said to have abused and attacked with the defacto complainant and the defacto complainant is said to have sustained injuries. A perusal of the statement of LW10 and LW11 revealed that the defacto complainant has sustained simple injuries.

3. The petitioner while taking lunch in a hotel had developed some wordy quarrel and therefore, there is no intention whatsoever to commit murder of the defacto complainant. In such circumstances, the invocation of Section 109(1) of BNS would not be attracted.

4. Today, the victim is present in person and he acknowledges the fact that he had agreed for quashing of the charge sheet.

CRL OP(MD) No. 22281 of 2026

5. Considering the above said facts, charge sheet in S.C.No.562 of 2025, on the file of the learned III Additional District and Sessions Court, Trichy, is hereby quashed.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. 07-10-2026 rgm

CRL OP(MD) No. 22281 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. rgm To

1. The State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by the Inspector Of Police, Thottiyam Police station, TiruchirappaIIi District, Crime No. 88/2025.

2. M. Pradeep S/o. Manogaran, VOC Nagar, Balasamuthiram,

CRL OP(MD) No. 22281 of 2026 07-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead