Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/22831/2026 of S.Indra Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL OP(MD) No. 22831 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 07-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

CRL OP(MD) No. 22831 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011342132026}

S.Indra

W/o.Sanjay Kumar

D.No.525/2-666A Thiruvalluvar Street,

Gomathipuram Street,

Madurai - 625020.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. State of Tamil Nadu rep. By

The Commissioner of Police,

Madurai.

2. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By

Inspector Of Police,

Anna Nagar Police Station,

Madurai – 20.

3. R.Arunadevi

The Correspondent,

FES Matriculation School,

2/667, Thalai Street,

Gomathipuram 6th Main,

Madurai - 20.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to direct the 2nd respondent, the Inspector of Police Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai to grant Police protection on petitioner life and liberty by considering the representation dated 15.07.2026 and pass any other appropriate orders.

CRL OP(MD) No. 22831 of 2026

For Petitioner(s):

M/s N.Sundaresan

For Respondent(s):

M/S.V.Shathurthi Raja,

Government Advocate (crl.side)

FOR R1 and R2

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present petition has been filed seeking direction as against the 2nd respondent to provide adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner.

2. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the third respondent, who is running a school, has been regularly threatening the petitioner and her husband and pressurising them to vacate the building, despite not being its owner. It is further alleged that the third respondent claims to have entered into an agreement with the owner of the building and she is attempting to evict the petitioner without following the due process of law.

3. The learned counsel further submits that, on every occasion when the third respondent has threatened the petitioner and her husband, complaints have been lodged. However, the police officials have not, so far, summoned the third respondent for an enquiry. Hence, the present petition has been filed.

CRL OP(MD) No. 22831 of 2026

4. In view of the above, the second respondent is directed to conduct an enquiry after issuing notice to the third respondent and resolve the issue within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the said observations, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 07-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No gvn To

1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai.

2. The Inspector Of Police, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai – 20.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CRL OP(MD) No. 22831 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. gvn CRL OP(MD) No. 22831 of 2026 07-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead