Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/22857/2026 of Jeeva Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By In on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL OP(MD) No. 22857 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 07-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

CRL OP(MD) No. 22857 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011372292026}

AND

CRL MP(MD) NO. 21782 OF 2026,CRL MP(MD) NO. 21783 OF 2026

1. Jeeva

S/o. Mrudhamuthu,

No. 31, Gandhipuram,

Thillai Nagar,

Trichy.

2. Senthil Kumar

S/o. Basha,

No. 25/B, Railway Station Street,

Srirangam,

Trichy.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sessions Court Police Station, Tiruchirappalli City, Crime No.226/2025.

2. M.Kumar

Sub-Inspector of Police,

Sessions Court Police Station,

Tiruchirappalli City.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: This petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records in STC No.2936 of 2026 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Trichy and quash the same as against the petitioners concerned.

CRL OP(MD) No. 22857 of 2026

For Petitioner(s):

J.K.Jayaselan

For Respondent(s):

M/s. P. Samuel Gunasingh,

Addl. Public Prosecutor For R1

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present petition has been filed by A1 and A2 in STC No.2936 of 2026 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Trichy seeking to quash the charge sheet, wherein, they are charged with offence under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 292, 41(6)(a) BNS, 2023.

2. Perusal of the charge reveals that the petitioners herein along with others, who belong to AITUC Labour Union are said to have unlawfully assembled at about 11:15 AM on 14.08.2025 and staged a road roko till 11.20A.M. raising slogans for protecting the rights of sanitary workers.

3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, it was a form of democratic protest in favour of the sanitary workers of the Municipal Corporation.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

CRL OP(MD) No. 22857 of 2026

5. As could be seen from the charge sheet, the petitioners herein, who belong to a Trade Union have protested in favour of the sanitary workers for a period of 5 minutes, and they have been dispersed immediately. The other accused persons also stand on the same footing and in such circumstances, the protest cannot be considered to be a criminal offence.

6. In such view of the matter, the charge sheet in STC No.2936 of 2026 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Trichy stand quashed not only as against the petitioners, but also as against other accused persons.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 07-10-2026 PNM To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Trichy

2. The Inspector Of Police, Sessions Court Police Station, Tiruchirappalli City,

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CRL OP(MD) No. 22857 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR J. PNM CRL OP(MD) No. 22857 of 2026 AND CRL MP(MD) NO. 21782 OF 2026,CRL MP(MD) NO. 21783 OF 2026 07-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead