Madras High Court

WP(MD)/13716/2025 of T.Ilangovan Vs The Chief Educational Officer on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 13716 of 2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 07-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

WP(MD) No. 13716 of 2025

CNR:{HCMD010579142025}

T.Ilangovan

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Chief Educational Officer,

Ramanathapuram,

Ramanathapuram District.

2. The District Educational Officer (Secondary), Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Secretary,

Ayiravysya Higher Secondary School,

Paramakudi,

Ramanathapuram District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus by calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the 3rd respondent in his proceedings No.180 of 2022-23 dated 25.02.2023 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as PG

Assistant in the 3rd respondent school within a time as stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner(s) :

Mr.P.Gunasekaran

For Respondent(s) :

Mr.Mahaboob Athiff,

Special Government Pleader for R1 and R2

: Mr.M.Jerin Mathew for R3

__________

( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 09:42:03 pm )

WP(MD) No. 13716 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order of suspension.

2. When this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel on either side submit that pending this writ petition, the order of suspension has been revoked and the petitioner has been reinstated into service. Therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the suspension period the respondents have not paid the subsistence allowance to the petitioner till date.

4. Recording the above submission, this writ petition is closed. Further an employee is entitled for subsistence allowance during the suspension period. Therefore, the respondents are directed to pay the eligible subsistence allowance to the petitioner during the suspension period within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 07-10-2026 Index: Yes/No DSK __________

( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 09:42:03 pm )

WP(MD) No. 13716 of 2025 To

1. The Chief Educational Officer Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

2. The District Educational Officer (Secondary) Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Secretary Ayiravysya Higher Secondary School, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. __________

( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 09:42:03 pm )

WP(MD) No. 13716 of 2025 B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk WP(MD) No. 13716 of 2025 07-10-2026 __________

( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 09:42:03 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead