Madras High Court

WP(MD)/28954/2026 of Alagusundaram K Vs The District Collector on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 28954 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 07-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

WP(MD) No. 28954 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011417652026}

AND

WMP(MD) Nos.21945 and 21946 of 2026

K.Alagusundaram

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector,

Office at District Collectorate,

Madurai.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Melur Revenue Division,

Melur, Madurai District.

3. The Tahsildar,

Madurai South,

Madurai.

4. The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar,

Madurai South,

Madurai.

5. Malathy

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in T.R.No.

2023/0109/24/018847 dated 21.06.2023 and quash the same together with all subsequent proceedings in patta No.35540 and mutations in favour of the 5th

WP(MD) No. 28954 of 2026

respondent as illegal and void, consequently direct respondents 1 to 3 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 26.04.2026 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court and restore/mutate the patta in accordance with law.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.P.Venkatesan

For Respondent(s):

Mr.I.Pinaygash

Special Government Pleader for R-1 to R-4

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 would submit that as against the order impugned in the present Writ Petition passed by the second respondent, an appeal had been preferred by the petitioner with the second respondent and the same is pending consideration.

2. The petitioner, who had earlier approached the second respondent as against the impugned order, can very well prosecute the said appeal, which is a statutory appeal. In this regard, this Court is of the view that the present Writ Petition need not be adjudicated upon. Hence, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner as against the proceedings of the second respondent in T.R.No.2023/0109/24/018847 dated 21.06.2023, on its own merits and in accordance with law after affording an opportunity to all the interested parties concerned. Such exercise shall be made by the second

WP(MD) No. 28954 of 2026 respondent within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

3. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 07-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Lm To

1. The District Collector, Office at District Collectorate, Madurai.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Melur Revenue Division, Melur, Madurai District.

3. The Tahsildar, Madurai South, Madurai.

4. The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Madurai South, Madurai.

WP(MD) No. 28954 of 2026 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. Lm WP(MD) No. 28954 of 2026 07-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead