Madras High Court

WP(MD)/32499/2025 of P.Ponnusamy Vs The District Collector on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 32499 of 2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 07-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

AND

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.D.SUMATHI

WP(MD) No. 32499 of 2025

CNR:{HCMD011616952025}

P.Ponnusamy

S/o.Perumal Konar,

East Street,

Mookar Natha,

Vembakottai Taluk,

Virudhunagar District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector

Virudhunagar,

Virudhunagar District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Sattur,

Virudhunagar,

Virudhunagar District.

3. The Tahsildhar

Vembakottai Taluk,

Virudhunagar District.

4. Nadukattu Virappan Swamy Temple

Represented by its President,

Korukkampatti Village,

Vembakottai Taluk,

Virudhunagar District.

..Respondent(s)

WP(MD) No. 32499 of 2025

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents herein to remove the encroachments in Government Poromboke land situated at Survey No.381 in Korukkampatti Village, Vembakottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District, within the time frame fixed by this court.

For Petitioner(s):

M/s.P.Subathra Devi

for M/s.Polax Legal Solutions

For Respondent(s):

Mrs.K.R.Shivashankari

Additional Government Pleader

for R1 to R3

Mr.R.Govindasamy

for R4

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard both sides.

2. We are satisfied that S.No.381, Korukkampatti Village measuring an extent of 0.20.50 hectares belongs to the fourth respondent Temple. Therefore, the fourth respondent cannot be called as an encroacher. If according to the petitioner, his access rights have been affected, it is always open to the petitioner to move the jurisdictional civil Court for establishing his rights. No relief can be granted in this petition.

WP(MD) No. 32499 of 2025

3. With the aforesaid liberty to the writ petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. (G.R.S.,J.) (M.D.S.,J.) 07-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rmi To

1. The District Collector Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Sattur, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

3. The Tahsildhar Vembakottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

WP(MD) No. 32499 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND M.D.SUMATHI, J. rmi WP(MD) No. 32499 of 2025 07-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead