Madras High Court

WP(MD)/33198/2025 of M.Vellaiammal Vs The Executive Officer on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 33198 of 2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 07-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

AND

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.D.SUMATHI

WP(MD) No. 33198 of 2025

CNR:{HCMD011691982025}

&

W.M.P.(MD)No.26207 of 2025

M.Vellaiammal

W/o Maruthai,

South Mariyamman Kovil street,

Dindigul District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Executive Officer,

Vadmadurai Municipality,

Dindigul District.

2. K.Nirmaladevi

D/o Karuppiah,

63A South Mariyamman Kovil street,

Dindigul District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of CERTIORARI to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Notice issued by the 1st respondent vide his Proceeding No. Na.Ka.No.405/2024 dated 12.11.2025 and quash the same as being arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction and pass such further or other __________

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 12:44:00 pm )

WP(MD) No. 33198 of 2025

order may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.M.Iniyavan

For Respondent(s):

Mr.M.S.Parthiban

Government Advocate

for R1

: Mr.C.M.Mari Chelliah Prabhu

for R2

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard both sides.

2. It is fairly admitted by the first respondent that the petition mentioned survey numbers are patta lands. Therefore, the first respondent will not have any jurisdiction in the matter. This is a private dispute between the writ petitioner and the second respondent. They will have to work out their rights before the jurisdictional civil Court. The impugned communication addressed to the local police is quashed. The rights of the parties will abide by the outcome of the pending civil suit. The Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (G.R.S.,J.) (M.D.S.,J.) 07-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No __________

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 12:44:00 pm )

WP(MD) No. 33198 of 2025 rmi __________

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 12:44:00 pm )

WP(MD) No. 33198 of 2025 To

1. The Executive Officer, Vadmadurai Municipality, Dindigul District.

2. K.Nirmaladevi D/o Karuppiah, 63A South Mariyamman Kovil street,

Dindigul District. __________

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 12:44:00 pm )

WP(MD) No. 33198 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND M.D.SUMATHI, J. rmi WP(MD) No. 33198 of 2025 07-10-2026 __________

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 12:44:00 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead