Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/22244/2026 of M.Manimuthupandiyan Vs The State of Tamilnadu on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL OP(MD) No. 22244 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 06-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

CRL OP(MD) No. 22244 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011386092026}

M.Manimuthupandiyan

S/o.Mayakalai,

D.No.388. LIG Colony,

Madurai.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The State of Tamilnadu

Rep by,

The Commissioner of Police,

Commissioner of Police Office,

Madurai City.

2. The Inspector of Police

E-3, Annanagar Police Station, (Law and Order), Madurai.

3. Pushpam

W/o.Mayakalai,

D.No.5/92, Kavignar Kannadasan Street,

Annanagar, Madurai.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: This petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS., to direct respondent No.2 herein not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

For Petitioner(s):

V.DIVYASHREE

For Respondent(s):

M/S. B. ARUN, GOVERNMENT

ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2

CRL OP(MD) No. 22244 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present petition has been filed seeking a direction as against the respondents not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

2. It could be seen from the records that the third respondent, who is the mother of the petitioner is said to have lodged a complaint as against the petitioner herein before the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) under the Senior Citizens Act. An order has been passed by the RDO, Madurai on 25.05.2023 directing the petitioner to vacate the premises. This order was put to challenge before this Court in WP(MD) No. 16377 of 2023 and the same came to be dismissed by this Court on 17.07.2026.

3. In order to implement the orders passed by RDO and confirmed by this Court, the police authorities are now summoning the petitioner to conduct an enquiry. In such circumstances, the contentions of the petitioner that some civil proceedings are pending cannot be looked into. In case if the petitioner succeeds before the civil Court, the petitioner can very well take possession of the property. This Court cannot interfere in the action of the police authorities, who are attempting to implement the orders of the RDO and this Court. There are no merits in the petition.

CRL OP(MD) No. 22244 of 2026

4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 06-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PNM To

1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Commissioner of Police, Commissioner of Police Office, Madurai City.

2. The Inspector of Police E-3, Annanagar Police Station, (Law and Order), Madurai.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CRL OP(MD) No. 22244 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. PNM CRL OP(MD) No. 22244 of 2026 06-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead