Madras High Court

CRP/6272/2026 of Vudayagiri Venkatadri Vs The Special Tahsildar(LA) on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

Civil Revision Petition Nos.6272 & 6273 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA011045392026}

Vudayagiri Venkatadri

S/o.V.Radha Krishnaiah

..Petitioner in

C.R.P.No.6272/2026

T.Bhavani

W/o.K.Sabesan

..Petitioner in

C.R.P.No.6273/2026

Vs

1. The Special Tahsildar (L.A.),

SIPCOT, Pillaipakkam,

Sriperumbudur – 602 105.

2. The Managing Director,

SIPCOT (L.A.), Egmore,

Chennai - 600 008.

..Respondents in both

revisions

Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the learned Additional District Judge II, Poonamallee, to dispose of L.A.O.P.Nos.404 & 438 of 2001 as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.

For Petitioner :

[in both revisions]

Ms.T.A.Preetha

for Mr.R.Vijayaraghaven

For Respondents :

[in both revisions]

Mrs.S.Yogalakshmi,

Additional Government Pleader [R1]

*****

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

COMMON ORDER

These civil revision petitions have been filed seeking a direction to the learned Additional District Judge II, Poonamallee, to dispose of L.A.O.P.Nos.404 and 438 of 2001 as expeditiously as possible.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for first respondent and carefully perused the materials available on record.

3. Even though the relief sought for in these civil revision petitions is for disposal of L.A.O.Ps., it is seen from records that already the matter was referred to the Lok Adalat and the Lok Adalat award was passed and thereby L.A.O.Ps. have been disposed of. The actual grievance of the petitioners is that the compensation amount has been deposited and the payment out application has been filed and the same has not been taken up by the Court below for more than 2 years and the amount is lying without yielding any interest. Therefore, the petitioners want the Court below to pass orders in the payment out application and to permit the petitioners to withdraw the compensation.

4. Considering the grievance expressed by the petitioners, there shall be a direction to the learned Additional District Judge II, Poonamallee, to number the payment out application and pass appropriate orders within a period of four

(4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. These Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of with the above direction. No costs. 06-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No gm/ksk To

1. The Additional District Judge II, Poonamallee.

2. The Special Tahsildar(LA) SIPCOT, Sriperumbudur.

N.ANAND VENKATESH J. gm/ksk Civil Revision Petition Nos.6272 & 6273 of 2026 06-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead