CRP/6319/2026 of Ilayaraja Vs Jenifer on 6 October 2026

ORDER

This civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of The Constitution of India against the order dated 30.9.2025 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in O.P.No.433 of 2025 on the file of the Sixth Additional Family Court at Chennai (for short, the Court below) wherein the Court below, based on application filed by the respondent – wife, ordered for visitation rights in respect of the children.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner – husband.

3. This Court has carefully considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner – husband and perused the materials available on record and more particularly the impugned order.

4. The petitioner and the respondent were married in 2010. They have two children pursuant to the wedlock. There has been a

( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 02:46:16 pm )

matrimonial dispute between them. The children are in the care and custody of the petitioner – father.

5. The respondent - wife filed GWOP.No.433 of 2025 before the Court below seeking for the custody of the minor children. Pending the said original petition, the said application was filed by the respondent – wife seeking for interim custody.

6. The Court below, on considering the contentions raised on either side and keeping in mind the interests of the minor children, made an interim arrangement whereby the respondent – wife was given the visitation rights to meet the minor children in the house of her husband for one week and to have access in her house at Theni the other week; that the petitioner – husband should drop the children at the house of the respondent at Theni during Saturdays at 10 AM and take them on Sundays at 4 PM; that similarly, the respondent – wife should meet the minor children in the petitioner – husband’s place during alternative week ends between 10 AM on Saturdays and 4 PM on Sundays.

( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 02:46:16 pm )

7. It is brought to the notice of this Court that one of the children is studying in 10th Standard and that therefore, the visitation rights are causing hindrance to the studies and that therefore, the petitioner – husband is seeking for interference with the impugned order passed by the Court below.

8. In the considered view of this Court, the Court below, while passing the impugned order, made it clear that in case of any inconvenience to the parties, the same could be brought to the notice of the respective assisting counsel appearing on both sides or to the parties directly so as to enable the parties to arrange accordingly.

9. If the impugned order has been complied with for some time and if, according to the petitioner – husband, some inconvenience is caused to one of the children, who is studying in the 10th Standard, an application can be moved before the Court below and a modification can be sought for. That exercise cannot be done by this Court under Article 227 of The Constitution of India. Except giving this clarity, no further orders can be passed in this

( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 02:46:16 pm )

revision petition.

10. The civil revision petition is disposed of in the above terms. Consequently, the connected CMP is closed. 06-10-2026 To The Sixth Additional Family Court, Chennai. RS

( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 02:46:16 pm )

N.ANAND VENKATESH,J RS CRP.No.6319 of 2026& CMP.No.27242 of 2026 06-10-2026

( Uploaded on: 08/10/2026 02:46:16 pm )