Madras High Court

WP/18928/2026 of G.Srinivasan Vs The District Collector on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 18928 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN

WP No. 18928 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA011009522026}

G.Srinivasan

S/o. Govindasamy,

Sathiyam Village and post,

Veepur Taluk, Cuddalore district 606 302

..Petitioner

Vs

1. The District Collector

Cuddalore , Cuddalore district.

2. The District Revenue officer

Virudhachalam Taluk,

Cuddalore, Cuddalore district

3. The Revenue Divisional officer

Virudhachalam, Cuddalore district 606 001

4. The Tahsildar

5. The Village Administrative officer

Maymathur village and post,

Veppur Taluk,

Cuddalore district 606 302

6. The Block Development officer

Nallur, Veppur Taluk,

WP No. 18928 of 2026

7. R.Narayanasamy

8. P.Ramasamy

..Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 6 to take immediate action to remove the illegal encroachment made by the respondents 7 and 8 in the land measuring an extent of 0.82.50 Ares comprised in Survey No 156/1 and 156/ 2 situated at Maymathur Village, Veppur Taluk, Cuddalore district which is classified as Lake Poramboke and to initiate appropriate proceedings for cancellation of patta No. 2615 illegally granted in favour of respondents 7 and 8 in respect of the Lake Poramboke land in S.No.156/2 by considering the petitioners representation dated 9.02.2026.

For Petitioners :

Mr.K.Prabhakaran

For Respondents :

Mr.B.Sivakolappan

Additional Government Pleader – for R1 to R5

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Learned Additional Government Pleader, based on the written instructions given by the Block Development Officer, Nallur Panchayat Union would submit that the encroachments in the water body have already been removed. Further, in the letter of the BDO it is stated that, they would protect the land free from encroachment. Regarding the claim of the petitioner for grant of

WP No. 18928 of 2026

patta, the petitioner has to approach the competent authorities under the Tamil Nadu Patta Passbook Act, 1983.

2. Since the encroachments have already been removed, no further adjudication is required in this writ petition and the same is disposed of. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.R.V.,J.) 06-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KST To

1. The District Collector, Cuddalore, Cuddalore district

2. The District Revenue officer Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore, Cuddalore district.

3. The Revenue Divisional officer Virudhachalam, Cuddalore district 606 001

4. The Tahsildar

5. The Village Administrative officer Maymathur village and post, Veppur Taluk, Cuddalore district 606 302.

6. The block Development officer Nallur, Veppur Taluk,

WP No. 18928 of 2026

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN J. KST WP No. 18928 of 2026 06-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead