Madras High Court

WP/38714/2026 of M/S. SRI AMMAN WIND SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs Assistant Commissioner on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 38714 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

WP No. 38714 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA012162062026}

AND WMP NO. 43453 & 43455 OF 2026

M/s. Sri Amman Wind Systems Private Limited Rep. by its Director Jeeva , 85/91, Varadharajapuram Main Road, Teynampet,

Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 018

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

Assistant Commissioner,

Mylapore Assessment circle,

Room No. 212, 2nd Floor, The Integrated Building for Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, (South Tower) Nandanam,

..Respondent(s)

Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Certiorari, calling for the records in GSTIN No 33AAICS5737R1ZM/2021-22 on the files of the Respondent and quash the impugned order dated 22-12-2025 with the reference no. ZD331225347214Q as arbitrary For Petitioner(s):

Mr.Danish Ur Rahman S

For Respondent(s):

Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, SGP

( Uploaded on: 13/10/2026 07:39:00 pm )

WP No. 38714 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 22.12.2025 passed by the respondent.

2. Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

4. When this matter was taken up for hearing, though the learned counsel for the petitioner made elaborate arguments, he, subsequently, admitted that the impugned order was passed after providing sufficient opportunities and thus, he seeks liberty of this Court to file an appeal against the said impugned assessment order. Further, he would submit that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- as additional deposit, over and above the statutory pre-deposit to the respondent. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

( Uploaded on: 13/10/2026 07:39:00 pm )

WP No. 38714 of 2026

5. In reply, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent requests this Court to pass any appropriate orders with regard to the filing of appeal on terms.

6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent and also perused the materials available on record.

7. In the case on hand, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that now the petitioner is willing to file an appeal against the impugned order dated 22.12.2025 passed by the respondent and he has restricted his relief and requested this Court to grant liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned assessment order since it will be sufficient to meet out the case of the petitioner.

8. Therefore, though this petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 22.12.2025, considering the submissions made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to dismiss the present petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned assessment order.

9. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

( Uploaded on: 13/10/2026 07:39:00 pm )

WP No. 38714 of 2026

10. While dismissing this petition, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the concerned Appellate Authority, subject to the payment of a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- as additional deposit, over and above the statutory pre-deposit, to the respondent within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. In such case, the Appellate Authority shall consider the said appeal, on its own merits and in accordance with law, by providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, without pressing for limitation.

11. At request of the petitioner, this Court directs the concerned Bank to defreeze the petitioner’s bank account, immediately upon production of a copy of this order along with the proof for payment of aforesaid amount and subsequently, intimate the same to the respondent. 06-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa

( Uploaded on: 13/10/2026 07:39:00 pm )

WP No. 38714 of 2026

To Assistant Commissioner, Mylapore Assessment circle, Room No. 212, 2nd Floor, The Integrated Building for Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, (South Tower) Nandanam,

( Uploaded on: 13/10/2026 07:39:00 pm )

WP No. 38714 of 2026

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 38714 of 2026 06-10-2026

( Uploaded on: 13/10/2026 07:39:00 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead