Madras High Court

WP/38963/2026 of Jayashri Polymer Vs The State Tax Officer 2 on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 38963 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

WP No. 38963 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012074162026}

and

WMP Nos.43731, 43733 and 43734 of 2026

Jayashri Polymer

Represented by its Proprietor, S.Chandrasekaran, No.41/3A1, Santhavelliamman Koil Street, Nedungudram, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu 600 127

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The State Tax Officer 2

Office of the Assistant Commissioner (ST), Thirukazhukundram Assessment Circle, No.42, Wahab Nagar, Thirukazhukundram- 603 109.

2. The Assistant Commissioner (ST),

Thirukazhukundram Assessment Circle,

No.42, Wahab Nagar,

Thirukazhukundram 603 109

..Respondent(s)

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the First Respondent in GSTIN33AEDPC5354A1ZA/2019-20 in Form GST SPL-07 dated 16.03.2026

and quash the impugned proceedings as passed contrary to the provisions of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017, and against the principles of natural justice, and to further direct the first respondent to grant waiver of interest as per section 128A

of the CGST/TNGST Act,2017.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.P.Rajkumar

For Respondent(s):

Mr.I.Dinesh, AGP

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 02:38:43 pm )

WP No. 38963 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The issue is relating to waiver of interest in terms of section 128A of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 164 and 75(2) of GST Rules.

2. The issue is covered by the judgment of this court in W.P.No.21378 of 2026, etc. batch dated 28.07.2026. Following the said decision, the present writ petition is allowed as prayed for. The connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

3. Considering the fact that the impugned order itself has been set aside, this Court is of the opinion that the attachment, if any, made on the bank account of the petitioner cannot survive any longer and hence, it is to be lifted. As a sequel, the respondent is directed to instruct the Bank concerned to release the attachment, and de-freeze the bank account of the petitioner, immediately upon production of a copy of this order. 06-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssk To

1. The State Tax Officer 2 Office of the Assistant Commissioner (ST), Thirukazhukundram Assessment Circle, No.42, Wahab Nagar, Thirukazhukundram- 603 109.

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 02:38:43 pm )

WP No. 38963 of 2026

2. The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Thirukazhukundram Assessment Circle, No.42, Wahab Nagar, Thirukazhukundram 603 109

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 02:38:43 pm )

WP No. 38963 of 2026

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. ssk WP No. 38963 of 2026 06-10-2026

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 02:38:43 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead