Madras High Court
WP(MD)/21375/2025 of B.Kamurudeen Vs The District Collector / Mon on 6 October 2026
WP(MD) No. 21375 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 06-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.D.SUMATHI
WP(MD) No. 21375 of 2025
CNR:{HCMD010810222025}
B.Kamurudeen
S/o Baba John,
D.No. L-167, R.M Colony,
East Govindapuram,
Dindigul District.
..Petitioner
Vs
1. The District Collector / Monitoring Committee Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2. The Commissioner
Dindigul Corporation,
Dindigul.
3. Saravanakumar
S/o Not Known,
H.B-55, 57, 58, 59, R.M Colony,
East Govindapuram,
Dindigul District.
4. Pandeeswari
W/o Saravanakumar,
H.B-55, 57, 58, 59, R.M Colony,
East Govindapuram,
Dindigul District.
..Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd
WP(MD) No. 21375 of 2025
respondents to remove the encroachment in Open Reservation Space and Road area at Housing Board, R.M Colony, East Govindapuram, Dindigul, based on the petitioners representation dt. 13.03.2025.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth
For Respondent(s):
Ms.M.R.Priyanka Jothi,
Government Advocate for R1
Mr.J.Lawrance,
Standing Counsel R2
Mr.S.Sarvagan Prabhu for R3
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard both sides.
2. The writ petitioner alleges that the third respondent has committed encroachment in the open reservation space and road area in RM Colony.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the third respondent categorically asserts that the third respondent has no property in the petition mentioned locality. He also states that the fourth respondent/Pandeeswari is not his wife.
4. It is seen that the petitioner has already settled the property in favour of his daughter/Sharbunisha on 14.07.2022. We failed to understand as how the
WP(MD) No. 21375 of 2025 petitioner will be having any interest in the subject matter. We grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition by impleading proper parties.
5. This writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. No costs. (G.R.S.,J.) (M.D.S.,J.) 06-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No IAS To
1. The District Collector / Monitoring Committee Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2. The Commissioner Dindigul Corporation, Dindigul.
WP(MD) No. 21375 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND M.D.SUMATHI, J. ias WP(MD) No. 21375 of 2025 06-10-2026