Madras High Court

WP(MD)/28890/2026 of Mayandi Vs The District Collector on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 28890 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 06-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

W.P(MD) No. 28890 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011416352026}

Mayandi

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector,

Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2. The District Revenue Officer,

Kokirakulam,

Tirunelveli District.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Kokirakulam,

Tirunelveli District.

4. The Tahsildar,

Palayamkottai Taluk,

Tirunelveli District.

5. Pandaram

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 2 and 3

to correct the wrongly mentioned extent in Patta Nos.45, 76, 77 and 86 in survey Nos.9/1, 9/2, 9/3 and 9/4 situated at Uthamapandiankulam Village, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District based on the petitioner’s representation dated 17.06.2026 within stipulated time by this Court.

__________

( Uploaded on: 09/10/2026 11:29:43 am )

WP(MD) No. 28890 of 2026

For Petitioner

:Mr.R.Rajaraman

For R1 to R4

:Mr.S.Venkatesh

Additional Government Pleader

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to correct the wrongly mentioned extent in Patta Nos.45, 76, 77 and 86 in survey Nos.9/1, 9/2, 9/3 and 9/4 situated at Uthamapandiankulam Village, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District based on the petitioner’s representation dated 17.06.2026 within stipulated time by this Court.

2. Heard Mr.R.Rajaraman, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Venkatesh, learned Additional Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to the fifth respondent is dispensed with.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the owner of the subject property and in order to correct the error crept during UDR proceedings, he has made a representation to the respondent authorities. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, he has approached this Court with the aforesaid relief. __________

( Uploaded on: 09/10/2026 11:29:43 am )

WP(MD) No. 28890 of 2026

4. From the perusal of the records, it is revealed that in a judgment made in S.A.(MD)No.12 of 2018, dated 19.06.2025, this Court has disposed of the said Second Appeal with liberty to the work out their remedy before the competent authority. It is to be noted that the petitioner had already made an application before the second respondent as early as on 05.08.2021 and also filed another representation on 17.06.2026 in that regard. However, from the perusal of the records, this Court is of the view that a detailed representation making out the claim of the petitioner has to be submitted by the petitioner.

5. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to submit a detailed representation making out his claim along with all necessary documents before the second respondent and if any such representation is being made by the petitioner, the second respondent is directed to consider the same and after conducting due enquiry by affording sufficient opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a representation made by the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. 06-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No cmr __________

( Uploaded on: 09/10/2026 11:29:43 am )

WP(MD) No. 28890 of 2026 To

1. The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Kokirakulam, Tirunelveli District.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kokirakulam, Tirunelveli District.

4. The Tahsildar, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District. __________

( Uploaded on: 09/10/2026 11:29:43 am )

WP(MD) No. 28890 of 2026 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. cmr WP(MD) No. 28890 of 2026 06-10-2026 __________

( Uploaded on: 09/10/2026 11:29:43 am )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead