Madras High Court

WP(MD)/29812/2025 of K.Tamilselvi Vs The District collector on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 29812 of 2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 06-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

AND

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.D.SUMATHI

WP(MD) No. 29812 of 2025

CNR:{HCMD011483882025}

K.Tamilselvi,

W/o.Kannan,

Nilamazhagiyamangalam,

Thiruvadanai Taluk,

Ramanathapuram District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector,

Collectorate Complex,

Ramanathapuram District,

Ramanathapuram.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

O/o.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Ramanathapuram,

Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Tahsildar,

O/o.The Tahsildar,

Thiruvadanai Taluk,

Ramanathapuram District.

4. Banu,

W/o.Mani,

Nilamazhagiyamangalam,

Thiruvadanai Taluk,

Ramanathapuram District.

5. Muthukumar,

S/o.Mani,

WP(MD) No. 29812 of 2025

Nilamazhagiyamangalam,

Thiruvadanai Taluk,

Ramanathapuram District.

..Respondent(s)

Prayer : Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment made by the 4th and 5th respondents in S.F.No.131/4

classified

as

public

pathway

situated

at

Nilamazhagiyamangalam Village, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 28.08.2025.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.A. Aruljenifer

For Respondent(s):

Ms.K.R.Shivashankari,

Additional Government Pleader

for R-1 to R-3.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to

3.

2. The petitioner is a resident of Nilamazhagiyamangalam Village in Thiruvadanai Taluk. According to her, there are encroachments in survey No.131/4. Admittedly, the said survey number has been classified as pathway.

WP(MD) No. 29812 of 2025

3. Encroachment in a pathway cannot be permitted. The third respondent is directed to take action as per law to have the encroachments removed. Notices shall be issued to all the encroachers. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition stands allowed. No costs. (G.R.S.,J.) (M.D.S.,J.) 06-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PMU To

1. The District collector, Collectorate Complex, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Tahsildar, O/o.The Tahsildar, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

WP(MD) No. 29812 of 2025

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND M.D.SUMATHI, J. PMU WP(MD) No. 29812 of 2025 06-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead