Madras High Court
CRP/2840/2026 of Kumaravel Vs N.Palanisamy on 5 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR
CRP No. 2840 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA011050882026}
and
CMP NO. 11596 OF 2026
1. Kumaravel
S/o Moorthy,
Res at No.49/49,
East Veppilli,
Ekkattampalayam,
Perundurai 638 051.
2. P.Moorthy
S/o Late Paramasivam,
Res at No.49/49,
East Veppilli,
Ekkattampalayam,
Perundurai 638 051
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. N.Palanisamy
S/o Nachimuthu,
No.6, Bharathi Nagar,
Mugasi Pidariyur,
Engur Road,
Chennimalai,
Perundurai Taluk,
Erode District
2. Sriram City Union Finance Limited
Registration Office Door No.123,
Angappa Naicken Street,
Chennai
Branch office
Door No.1,
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 01:32:31 pm )
Vedeniary Hospital Street,
Erode, Rep by its authorised signatory
3. P.Selvaraj
S/o Late Paramasivam,
No.153, Kamaraj Nagar,
Bhavani.
..Respondent(s)
Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the report filed by the Senior Bailiff dated 07.10.2025 in EA.no.14 of 2025 in EPR.No.29 of 2016 in ACP.No.944 of 2014 on the file of the first Additional District Court, Erode may allow the CRP.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.S.V.Logeswaran
for R.Hemalatha
For Respondent(s):
Mr.K.Nagesh for R1
M/s.A.Swaminathan for R2
R3 - No Such Person
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the Amin's Report dated 07.10.2025, recording the delivery of the subject property to the Court auction purchaser.
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 01:32:31 pm )
2. When the matter came up for hearing on 01.06.2026, this Court passed the following order: The learned counsel for the revision petitioners submitted that movable properties worth approximately Rs.50 lakhs kept inside the premises were not disclosed in the Amin's Report and, therefore, the report is liable to be challenged.
(ii) The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that an appeal has already been preferred before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and a conditional order directing deposit of Rs.1 crore was passed. The said condition has been complied with and an order of status quo has also been granted. Therefore, as on date, the matter is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
(iii) The petitioners now seek investigation regarding the movable properties allegedly lying inside the premises and valued at about Rs.50 lakhs.
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 01:32:31 pm )
(iv) In view of the order of status quo granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court is inclined to issue notice to the respondent.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent would submit that the Special Leave Petition filed by the 2nd petitioner in SLP(Civil) Diary No.4746 of 2026, challenging the judgment and decree passed in CMA.No.2116 of 2024 was dismissed by the Apex Court on 01.10.2026.
4. Therefore, as on today, there is no status quo order in view of the disposal of the main Special Leave Petition.
5. The impugned Amin's Report has been challenged on the ground that the movable property worth Rs.50,000/- kept in the subject property has not been taken note of by the Amin.
6. If it is the case of the petitioners that the alleged movable property kept in the subject property has not been noted by the Amin in his Report, it is for the petitioners to file an appropriate petition before the execution Court. The
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 01:32:31 pm )
petitioners are not entitled to challenge the Amin's Report by filing a revision. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the revision petition and the same is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate application before the Executing Court in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 05-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ub To The First Additional District Court, Erode.
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 01:32:31 pm )
S.SOUNTHAR J. ub CRP No. 2840 of 2026 and CMP NO. 11596 OF 2026 05-10-2026
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 01:32:31 pm )
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 01:32:31 pm )