Madras High Court
CRP/6215/2026 of J.Prem Kumar Vs N.Suguna on 5 October 2026
CRP.No.6215 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR
CRP.No.6215 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA011812392026}
J.Prem Kumar
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
N.Suguna
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the trial court to register and entertain the recall petition filed in I.A.SR.No.2005 of 2026 in I.A.No.45 of 2021 in H.M.O.P.No.282 of 2016 on on the file of the learned Subordinate Court, Alandur.
For Petitioner
: Mr.S.Selva Thirumurugan
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking a direction to the Trial Court to number the interlocutory application filed by the petitioner in I.A.SR.No.2005 of 2026 in I.A.No.45 of 2021 in H.M.O.P.No.282 of 2016.
2. It is seen from the typed-set of papers that the petitioner filed an application seeking to recall of the order passed in I.A.No.45 of 2021 in
( Uploaded on: 09/10/2026 01:11:10 pm )
CRP.No.6215 of 2026
H.M.O.P.No.282 of 2016, dated 19.12.2024. The said application was returned by the concerned Court on 01.06.2026 raising maintainability issue. The petitioner instead of offering his explanation before the concerned Court, filed this civil revision petition seeking a direction to number the I.A.SR.No.2005 of 2026. Whenever the maintainability issue raised by the Court below, it is incumbent on the petitioner to offer his explanation and represent the papers. If the explanation offered by the petitioner is acceptable, the Court below can proceed to number the application and hearing it on merits. On the other hand, if the explanation offered by the petitioner is not acceptable, the Court below shall call the matter in open Court, hear the petitioner and then pass orders on merits.
3. Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to represent the returned papers before the concerned Court offering his explanation, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The Trial Court is directed to consider the explanation offered by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, as indicated above. No costs. 05-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No dm
( Uploaded on: 09/10/2026 01:11:10 pm )
CRP.No.6215 of 2026
To The Subordinate Court, Alandur.
( Uploaded on: 09/10/2026 01:11:10 pm )
CRP.No.6215 of 2026
S.SOUNTHAR J. dm CRP.No.6215 of 2026 05-10-2026
( Uploaded on: 09/10/2026 01:11:10 pm )