Madras High Court

CRP.SR/107512/2026 of Rasheeth Vs Yavu on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR

CMP No. 19989 of 2026 in

CRP.Sr.No.107512 of 2026

Rasheeth

..Appellant(s)

Vs

M.Yavu

..Respondent(s)

Prayer in CMP No. 19989 of 2026 :- The civil miscellaneous petition is filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, praying to condone the delay of 1492 days in filing the present Civil Revision Petition against order passed in IA No.20 of 2018 in OS No.10 of 2014 by Principal District Munsif Court cum Judicial Magistrate, Gudalur, The Nilgiris.

Prayer in CRP.Sr.No. 107512 of 2026 :- Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 151 of CPC, praying to set aside the order dated 15.10.2020 passed in IA No.20 of 2018 in OS No.10 of 2014 by Principal District Munsif Court cum Judicial Magistrate, Gudalur, The Nilgiris.

For Appellant(s):

M.Velmurugan

For Respondent(s):

M/S.J.Franklin

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1492 days in filing the civil revision petition.

2. It is seen from the typed set of papers that the impugned order was passed on 15.06.2020. The civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioner only on 30.06.2026. In the affidavit filed in support of the condone delay petition, it was stated that the impugned order was passed during COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the petitioner could not present the revision immediately. It is further submitted that after COVID-19 was over, the petitioner was suffering from serious medical complications and hence, he could not present the revision immediately.

3. It is a matter of common knowledge that COVID-19 was over during February 2022. The petitioner has no valid reason for explaining the delay from February 2022 to June 2026. A vague averment has been made in the affidavit as if the petitioner was suffering from serious medical complications, hence, prevented from filing the revision in time. The petitioner has not produced any medical documents to substantiate the medical complications from February 2022 to June 2026. A vague allegation in the affidavit without mentioning the details of medical complication is not sufficient to condone the inordinate delay of 1492 days. Hence, the petitioner has not made out sufficient cause to condone the delay. Accordingly, the civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed. The civil revision petition is rejected in SR stage itself. No costs. 05-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nr

S.SOUNTHAR, J. NR To The Principal District Munsif Court cum Judicial Magistrate, Gudalur, The Nilgiris. CMP No. 19989 of 2026 in CRP.Sr.No.107512 of 2026 05-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead