Madras High Court

WP/38805/2026 of T.SUBRAMANIAN Vs The Secretary on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 38805 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN

WP No. 38805 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA012280682026}

AND

WMP NO. 43537 OF 2026

T.Subramanian

S/o S.C. Thangavel,

No 9 Periyannan Street,

Karattur, Ariyappampalayam Village,

Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District 638 402

..Petitioner

Vs

1. The Secretary

Government of Tamil Nadu

Revenue and Disaster Management,

Secretariat, Fort St. Geroge,

Chennai 600 009.

2. The District Collector

Erode District, Erode

3. The Tahsildar

Sathyamangalm Taluk office,

Sathiyamangalam,

4. The Head Surveyor

Sathyamangalam taluk office,

Sathiyamangalam

Erode District 638 402.

WP No. 38805 of 2026

5. The Revenue Inspector

Kadampur

Sathyamangalam taluk,

Erode District 638 503

6. The Village administrative officer

Guthiyalathru Village,

Sathyamangalam Taluk,

Erode District 638 503

..Respondents

Prayer : Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Prohibition for prohibiting the respondents from in any manner evicting the petitioner form or interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the lands comprised in Survey No 2234/1 to an extent of 1.04.0 hectare and 2233/ 3 to an extent of 0.06.0 ares and 2234/ 3 to an extent of 0.08.0 Ares and 2234/4 - 0.010 res situated at Guthiyalathur Village,Sathyamanagalam Taluk, Erode District, pending disposal of the statutory revision dated 02.09.2026 filed before the 1st Respondent under section 10A of the Tamil nadu land Encroachment Act 1905.

For Petitioner :

Mr.K.Krishnan

For Respondent(s):

Mr.K.Surender

Special Government Pleader

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Writ of Mandamus has been instituted to grant an order prohibiting the respondents from in any manner evicting the petitioner form or interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the lands comprised in

WP No. 38805 of 2026

Survey No 2234/1 to an extent of 1.04.0 hectare and 2233/ 3 to an extent of 0.06.0 ares and 2234/ 3 to an extent of 0.08.0 Ares and 2234/4 - 0.010 res situated at Guthiyalathur Village,Sathyamanagalam Taluk, Erode District, pending disposal of the statutory revision dated 02.09.2026 filed before the 1st Respondent under section 10A of the Tamil nadu land Encroachment Act 1905.

2. The relief sought for in the nature of a civil suit claiming civil rights is not entertainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Admittedly, the writ petitioner has already instituted a civil suit in O.S.No.111 of 2026 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Sathiamangalam, Erode District.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is claiming title. If so, the relief sought for in the present writ petition not to evict him from the subject property is not maintainable and if at all the petitioner claims any title or ownership, he has to establish the same in the manner known to law through a competent civil court.

4. The practice of converting civil litigations as writ petitions, at no circumstances, be encouraged by the High Courts. Civil rights are to be established in a trial nature proceedings through documents in original and

WP No. 38805 of 2026

evidences available. Roving enquiry cannot be conducted by the High Court in a writ proceedings. Adjudication of civil rights require elaborate consideration and therefore the arms of the powers of judicial review of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot be extended to consider the relief relating to declaration of civil rights.

5. Granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the competent civil Court of law, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.R.V.,J.) 05-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KST

WP No. 38805 of 2026

To

1. The Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu Revenue and Disaster Management, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The District Collector Erode District, Erode

3. The Tahsildar Sathyamangalam Taluk office, Sathiyamangalam, Erode District 638 402

4. The Head Surveyor Sathyamangalam taluk office, Sathiyamangalam Erode District 638 402

5. The Revenue Inspector Kadampur Sathyamangalam taluk, Erode District 638 503

6. The Village administrative officer Guthiyalathru Village, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District 638 503

WP No. 38805 of 2026

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN J. KST WP No. 38805 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 43537 OF 2026 05-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead