Madras High Court
WP/38993/2026 of M/s Madhumitha Enterprises Vs The Chief Engineer on 5 October 2026
WP No. 38993 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
WP No. 38993 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA012154132026}
M/s Madhumitha Enterprises
Rep by its Proprietor,
No 11/3B Perumal Kovil Street,
Krishna Puram,
Ambur 635 802
Tiruppathru District
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Chief Engineer
TANGEDCO, Vellore Region,
Kamaraj Building,
No 10, East Main Road,
Gandhi Nagar,
Vellore 632 006
2. The Superintending Engineer
TANGEDCO,
Ballamal Nagar,
Tirupathur 635 601
3. Assistant Audit officer
TANGEDCO,
AP No 2 TNPDCL - AB
Kamaraj Building,
No 10 East Main Road,
Gandhi Nagar,
Vellore 632 006
..Respondent(s)
Prayer:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation of this petitioner dated 25.08.2026 and direct the third
WP No. 38993 of 2026
respondent to recalculate the audit slips thoroughly and on concluding it as miscalculated set aside the same.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr. S.Deivasigamani
For Respondent(s):
Mr. G.S.Janani
Standing Counsel
R1 to R3
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
This writ petition is filed for the following relief: “To direct the first respondent to consider the representation of this petitioner dated 25.08.2026 and direct the third respondent to recalculate the audit slips thoroughly.”
2. The petitioner company is a contractor carrying work on contract basis in Government departments. The petitioner discharged some contract work with the respondent’s department for a sum of Rs.2,88,749/- and the respondent had settled the amount. Meanwhile, the 3rd respondent by demand note instructed the petitioner to remit a sum of Rs.2,16,156/- as it has paid excess to the actual contract amount of Rs.1,05,879/-. Therefore, the petitioner sent a representation dated 25.08.2026 to the 1st respondent to direct the 3rd respondent to recalculate the audit slips. Since there is no response the petitioner is before this Court.
WP No. 38993 of 2026
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner’s representation dated 25.08.2026 has not been considered to date, a direction is issued to the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 05-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KAN
WP No. 38993 of 2026
To
1. The Chief Engineer TANGEDCO, Vellore Region, Kamaraj Building, No 10, East Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Vellore 632 006
2. The Superintending Engineer TANGEDCO, Ballamal Nagar, Tirupathur 635 601
3. Assistant Audit officer TANGEDCO, AP No 2 TNPDCL - AB Kamaraj Building, No 10 East Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Vellore 632 006
WP No. 38993 of 2026
P.T.ASHA J. KAN WP No. 38993 of 2026 05-10-2026