Madras High Court

WP/39053/2026 of M.S.SRINIVASAN Vs CANARA BANK on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 39053 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

WP No. 39053 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA012277012026}

and

WMP No. 43849 of 2026

M.S.Srinivasan

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. Canara Bank,

Represented by its General Manager,

Recovery, Legal and Fraud Prevention Section, Circle Office,7th Floor, Ansal Tower, 38,Nehru Place, New Delhi-110 019

2. Reserve Bank of India,

Represented by its Chief General Manager, Department of Regulation, Central Office, Mumbai-400 001

..Respondent(s)

Prayer:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking writ of mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondent relating to the impugned order bearing Ref.DCO.RLFP.ILFS.02.2023 dated 20.06.2026 and quash the same insofar as the classification of the Petitioner as Fraud and consequently restrain the Respondents not to give effect to any such classification or any consequential action against the Petitioner.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr. Kaveen C

WP No. 39053 of 2026

For Respondent(s):

Mr. R.Sreedhar

Standing Counsel

R1

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

This writ petition is filed for the following relief: “To call for the records of the 1st respondent relating to the impugned order bearing Ref.DCO.RLFP.ILFS.02.2023 dated 20.06.2026 and quash the same insofar as the classification of the Petitioner as Fraud and consequently restrain the Respondents not to give effect to any such classification or any consequential action against the Petitioner.”

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition, as orders have already been passed on his request and he has made an endorsement to that effect. However, the learned counsel proposes to challenge the said order.

3. Recording, the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 05-10-2026 KAN

WP No. 39053 of 2026

To

1. Canara Bank, Represented by its General Manager, Recovery, Legal and Fraud Prevention Section, Circle Office,7th Floor, Ansal Tower, 38,Nehru Place, New Delhi-110 019

2. Reserve Bank of India, Represented by its Chief General Manager, Department of Regulation, Central Office, Mumbai-400 001

WP No. 39053 of 2026

P.T.ASHA J. KAN WP No. 39053 of 2026 05-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead