Madras High Court

WP/41290/2025 of K.JAYARAJ Vs DISTRICT COLLECTOR on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 41290 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN

WP No. 41290 of 2025

CNR: {HCMA012437352025}

K.Jayaraj

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. District Collector

Office Of The District Collector,

Coimbatore -641 018

2. Revenue Divisional Officer (south)

Office Of The Revenue Divisional Officer (south) Coimbatore.

3. Tahsildar

Office Of The Tahsildar, Perur,

Coimbatore-641010

4. Rathinasamy

5. Selvaraj

6. Papathi

7. Kokila

..Respondent(s)

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India issuing writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 4 to 7 on the cart track situated in Survey No.425/1 within a stipulated period as fixed by

WP No. 41290 of 2025

this Honble Court

For Petitioner(s):

Mr. S. Parthasarathy

For Respondent(s):

Mr.B.Sivakollappan

Additional Government Pleader for R1-3

Mr.A.E.Ravichandran for R4-6

No appearance for R7

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The writ petition has been instituted to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment made by the respondents 4 to 7 on the cart track situated in Survey No.425/1.

2. With reference to the relief sought for in the present writ petition, Tahsildar, Perur addressed a letter to the Government on 04.10.2026. Reading of the letter would show that dispute exists between the family members of the petitioner. Tahsildar has not stated that the subject property is classified as ‘cart track’, however it states that the family dispute exists with reference to the subject property.

3. That being the fact, the aggrieved person has to approach the competent civil Court of law for the purpose of establishing his right in the manner known to law. Granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent civil Court of law, the present writ petition stands

WP No. 41290 of 2025

disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.R.V.,J.) 05-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GD To

1. District Collector Office Of The District Collector, Coimbatore -641 018

2. Revenue Divisional Officer (south) Office Of The Revenue Divisional Officer (south) Coimbatore.

3. Tahsildar Office Of The Tahsildar, Perur, Coimbatore-641010

WP No. 41290 of 2025

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN, J. GD WP No. 41290 of 2025 05-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead