Madras High Court

WP(MD)/28571/2026 of DSK Engineering Works Vs The Assistant Commissioner ( on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

W.P.(MD) No.28571 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 05.10.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

W.P.(MD) No.28571 of 2026

{CNR: HCMD011360432026}

and

W.M.P.(MD) No.21665 of 2026

Case QR

DSK Engineering Works,

Plot No. E12, Phase-II,

SIDCO Industrial Estate,

Valavanthankottai, Thuvakudi,

Tiruchirappalli - 625 015.

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Assistant Commissioner (ST),

O/o Commercial Tax Department,

Tiruverumbur,

Tiruchirappalli Division.

... Respondent

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the respondent in Reference Number ZA330925037209F dated 08.09.2025 with effect from 30.07.2025 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to revoke the cancellation of the GSTIN 33AAGFD0738G1ZT within a stipulated time period in accordance with law.

W.P.(MD) No.28571 of 2026

For Petitioner

: Mr.R.Sureshkumar

For Respondent

: Mr.R.Parthiban

Special Government Pleader

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

The petitioner challenges an order of cancellation of its GST registration. The petitioner was a registered person under applicable GST laws. Pursuant to a show cause notice dated 30.07.2025 stating that the petitioner had not filed GST monthly returns regularly, the impugned order was issued.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cancellation of the GST registration is causing immense hardship and that such cancellation should be revoked. In support of his contentions, he draws reference to the Judgment of this Court in Suguna Cutpiece v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST)(GST), W.P.Nos.25048 of 2021 batch (Suguna Cutpiece).

3. Mr.R.Parthiban, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondent. He submits that the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled on account of the petitioner not filing returns

W.P.(MD) No.28571 of 2026 regularly. He further submits that the order issued in Suguna Cutpiece was a conditional order and that the petitioner should be directed to comply with all conditions stipulated therein.

4. In Suguna Cutpiece, this Court directed restoration of GST registration subject to several terms and conditions. The said judgment was followed thereafter in many cases. In order to maintain consistency, I am inclined to follow the said judgment.

5. In the operative portion thereof, the following directions were issued: "i. The petitioner is directed to file her returns for the period prior to the cancellation of registration, together with tax dues along with interest thereon and the fee fixed for belated filing of returns within a period of forty five (45) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

ii. It is made clear that such payment of tax, interest, fine / fee and etc. shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of the petitioner.

W.P.(MD) No.28571 of 2026

iii. If any Input Tax Credit has remained unutilized, it shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate or competent officer of the Department.

iv. Only such approved Input Tax Credit shall be allowed to utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liability under the Act and Rules. v. The petitioner shall also pay GST and file the returns for the period subsequent to the cancellation of the registration by declaring the correct value of supplies.

vi. If any Input Tax Credit was earned, it shall be allowed to be utilised only after scrutinising and approving by the respondents or any other competent authority.

vii. On payment of tax, penalty and uploading of returns, the registration shall stand revived forthwith.

viii. The respondents shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow the petitioner to file the returns and to pay the tax / penalty / fine.

W.P.(MD) No.28571 of 2026

ix. The above exercise shall be carried out by the respondents within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

6. The restoration of the GST registration is subject to and conditional upon fulfilling the above conditions.

7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of on the same terms without any order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 05.10.2026 JEN NCC : No Index : No To The Assistant Commissioner (ST), O/o Commercial Tax Department, Tiruverumbur, Tiruchirappalli Division.

W.P.(MD) No.28571 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. JEN W.P.(MD) No.28571 of 2026 05.10.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead