Madras High Court

WP(MD)/28577/2026 of Iyappan Vs The Revenue Divisional Offic on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 05-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

WP(MD) No. 28577 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011401702026}

Iyappan

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Kodaikkanal Taluk,

Dindigul District.

2. The Thasildar,

Kodaikkanal Taluk,

Dindigul District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing to the Respondents to take necessary steps to change extent of the online patta No.1406 and issue online patta for the extent of 0-98.0 Ares instead of 0-48.0 Ares in respect of property in New S.No.127/16 in old survey No. 637/93 respectively situated at Kookkal Village, Kodaikkanal Taluk, Dindigul District on the basis of the 2nd respondent’s recommendation letter in Na.Ka.No.3335/2025/Aal dated on 11.02.2026 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner

:Mr.V.G.Vallarasu Chezhiyan

For Respondents

:Mr.S.Siva Thilakar

Special Government Pleader

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Mandamus seeking a direction against the respondents to take necessary steps to rectify the extent of the online patta No.1406 and issue online patta for the extent of 0-98.0 ares instead of 0-48.0 ares in respect of property in New S.No.127/16 in old S.No.637/93 respectively situated at Kookkal Village, Kodaikkanal Taluk, Dindigul District on the basis of the 2nd respondent’s recommendation letter in Na.Ka.No.3335/2025/Aal, dated 11.02.2026.

2. Mr.S.Siva Thilakar, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.

3. From the perusal of the records, it is revealed that pursuant to the representation made by the petitioner for rectifying the error in the extent of the online patta issued in favour of the petitioner based on the ‘A’ register, the second respondent in his communication in Na.Ka.No.3335/2025/Aal dated on 11.02.2026 had recommended the first respondent to rectify the error made in the patta issued in favour of the petitioner.

4. In such view of the matter, this Court is inclined to issue the following directions:

(1) The petitioner is directed to submit a fresh representation to the first respondent along with the recommendation of the second respondent and on such representation being made, the first respondent is directed to consider the said representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such representation.

5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 05-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No cmr To

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kodaikkanal Taluk, Dindigul District.

2. The Thasildar, Kodaikkanal Taluk, Dindigul District.

K.KUMARESH BABU, J. cmr W.P.(MD)No.28577 of 2026 05-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead