Madras High Court

WP(MD)/28698/2026 of S.MATHIVANAN CONTRACTOR Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) NO. 28698 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 05-10-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR

RAMAMOORTHY

WP(MD) NO. 28698 of 2026

{CNR: HCMD011400922026}

Case QR

WMP (MD) No.21769 of 2026

1. S.Mathivanan Contractor

Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Deputy State Tax Officer - II /

The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

Pattukottai - I Assessment Circle

Commercial Taxes Office

Taluk Office Buildings

Pattukottai

Thanjavur District - 614 601.

Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.Rooban B

For Respondent(s): Ms.P.Sudarkodi Nachiyar, GA (Taxes)

Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pertaining to impugned order of the Respondent in Ref. No.

ZD331225333733M/2021-22 dated 22.12.2025 and quash the same and to consequently direct the Respondent to redo the assessment afresh after providing adequate opportunity and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper to the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The order dated 22.12.2025 is assailed in this petition on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice.

2. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand under the impugned order as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made.

3. Ms.P.Sudarkodi Nachiyar, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for the respondent.

4. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. In these circumstances, subject to the remittance of 25% of the tax demand under the impugned order within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside so as to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to contest the matter on merits. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within 5 months from the date of remittance of 25% of the tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of this condition, the bank attachment relating to the impugned order shall be raised.

5. This Writ Petition stands disposed of on the above terms. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 05-10-2026 PKN To

1. The Deputy State Tax Officer - II / The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Pattukottai - I Assessment Circle Commercial Taxes Office Taluk Office Buildings Pattukottai Thanjavur District - 614 601.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

,J.

PKN W.P (MD)No.28698 of 2026 05.10.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead