Madras High Court
CRP/6204/2026 of Naveen Vs Mayuri on 1 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Civil Revision Petition No.6204 of 2026
and
C.M.P.No.26828 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA011601122026}
Naveen
S/o.Murugan
..Petitioner
Vs
Mayuri
W/o.Naveen
..Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the order dated 24.04.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2024
in Crl.A.No.28 of 2024 on the file of learned Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri.
For Petitioner:
Mr.Barathwaz T
*****
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 24.04.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.28 of 2024 by the learned Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri, wherein the application filed by the petitioner to receive additional evidence, came to be rejected by the Court below.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and carefully perused the materials available on record. This Court also went through the order passed by the Court below.
3. The respondent had initiated proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and DVOP No.4 of 2022 came to be allowed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pappireddipatty and aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed Crl.A.No.28 of 2024, before the Court below. During the pendency of the appeal, Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.28 of 2024 was filed to receive additional evidence. This application was filed on the ground that the petitioner had obtained information that the respondent/wife is working in a private school as a teacher and drawing a salary of Rs.14,500/- per month and had admitted her daughter also in a private school and therefore, the petitioner wanted to let in additional evidence before the Court.
4. The Court below dismissed the application on the ground that the respondent herself admitted that she is employed in a private school and earning a sum of Rs.10,000/- p.m. and the same is not enough to maintain herself and her daughter and to meet her educational expenses. The Court below also found that even if the respondent is said to be earning a sum of Rs.14,500/- per month that will not be a ground to completely bar the respondent from claiming maintenance if it is found that the income is insufficient and it is not enough to maintain herself and the child. The above finding does not suffer from any perversity warranting interference of this Court. The Court below has properly applied its mind and assigned reasons. Accordingly, this civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 01-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No gm/pss To The Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri.
N.ANAND VENKATESH J. gm/pss Civil Revision Petition No.6204 of 2026 01-10-2026