Madras High Court
CRP/6226/2026 of J.Suresh Vs Gracy on 1 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Civil Revision Petition No.6226 of 2026
and
C.M.P.No.26907 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA012112422026}
1. J.Suresh
S/o.Joseph
2. J.Shanthi
W/o.Joseph
3. Joseph
S/o.Gopal
4. Papu
W/o.Androse
5. Andrews
S/o.Kaliyan
..Petitioners
Vs
1. Gracy
W/o.J.Suresh
2. Minor Jabez Joyson
represented by next friend Natural Guardian Mother R.Gracy
..Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the order dated 21.07.2026 passed in C.M.P.No.1224 of 2026 in DVC No.30 of 2024 by the Additional Mahila Court, Salem.
For Petitioners:
Mr.J.Nandagopal
*****
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This civil revision petition has been filed against the order dated 21.07.2026 passed in C.M.P.No.1224 of 2026 in D.V.C.No.30 of 2024 by the Additional Mahila Court, Salem, wherein the Court below allowed the application filed by the respondents to mark a pen drive as a documentary evidence on the side of the respondents.
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and carefully perused the materials available on record. This Court also went through the impugned order.
3. The main ground urged on the side of the petitioners is that the pen drive is in the nature of secondary evidence and the same cannot be admitted without fulfilling the condition under Section 63 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which contemplates the filing of the certificate.
4. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Court below, in spite of the objections made by the petitioners, has permitted the pen drive to be marked in this case. The petitioners are questioning the very admissibility of the document (pen drive) and therefore, the Court below shall take into consideration the objections raised by the petitioners while relying upon the pen drive that has already been marked on the side of the respondents. This observation will sufficiently take care of the grievance expressed by the petitioners. This Civil Revision Petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 01-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No gm/pss To The Additional Mahila Judge, Salem.
N.ANAND VENKATESH J. gm/pss Civil Revision Petition No.6226 of 2026 01-10-2026