Madras High Court
REV.APPL.SR/53512/2018 on 1 October 2026
REV.APPL SR No. 53512 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GK.MUTHUKUMAAR
REV.APPL SR No. 53512 of 2018
CNR:{HCMA013174512018}
and
C.M.P.No.21230 of 2019
1. The Inspector General of Registration and Chief Controlling Revenue Authority 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 28.
2. The Sub Registrar,
District Registrar Cadre,
SRO, Mylapore,
100, Santhome High Road,
Chennai – 28.
.. Applicant (s)
Vs
1. R.Santhosh
2. R.Kaushik
Rep.by their Power of Attorney Agent
K.Ganesan
..Respondent(s)
Review Application filed under Order XLVII, Rule 1 read with Section 114 C.P.C., to review the order dated 23.10.2017 made in W.A.No.85 of 2015.
Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order IV Rule 9(4) of A.S.Rules, to condone the delay of 168 days in representing the Rev.Appl.SR.No.53512 of 2018 filed against the order dated 23.10.2017 made in W.A.No.85 of 2015.
REV.APPL SR No. 53512 of 2018
For Applicant (s):
Mr.V.Tamizhanban
Government Advocate
For Respondent(s):
Mr.A.V.Arun
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by P.Velmurugan J.) This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 168 days in representing the Rev.Appl.SR.No.53512 of 2018 filed against the order dated 23.10.2017 made in W.A.No.85 of 2015.
2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that, during the pendency of the Review Application, the respondents had already paid the deficit stamp duty, pursuant to the orders of the second appellant and obtained the document. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the appellant also accepted the same.
3. In view of the above development, the relief sought in the Review Application itself has become infructuous. As a consequence, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed, and connected Review Application is closed at the S.R.stage itself. There shall be no order as to costs. (P.V.,J.) (G.K.M.,J.) 01-10-2026 ms
REV.APPL SR No. 53512 of 2018
P.VELMURUGAN J. AND GK.MUTHUKUMAAR J. ms REV.APPL SR No. 53512 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.21230 of 2019 01-10-2026