Madras High Court

WP/38088/2026 of MOHIT IMPEX Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) on 1 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 38088 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01.10.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 38088 of 2026

and

W.M.P. Nos.42783 and 42785 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012132722026}

Mohit Impex

Rep. by its Proprietor Mr. Mohit Tejraj Jain, Plot No.232, Vadakarai, Bajanai Kovil Street, K.M.H Road, Chennai - 600 052.

..Petitioner

Vs

Assistant Commissioner (ST)

Cholavaram Assessment Circle,

Room No.109, 1st Floor,

Integrated Commercial Taxes Building,

Elephant Gate, Wall Tax Road,

Chennai-600 003

..Respondent

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned Order bearing GSTIN 33AWSPJ2862M1ZZ FY 2021-22

dated 01.12.2025 and its Consequential Demand Order dated 01.12.2025

having Reference No. ZD331225006870S FY 2021-22 issued by the Respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioner:

Mr.Sanskar Samdaria

for M/s. Sourabh and Associates

For Respondent:

Ms.G.Dhana Madhri,

Special Government Pleader (Tax)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order dated 01.12.2025 is assailed primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice.

( Uploaded on: 05/10/2026 02:36:18 pm )

WP No. 38088 of 2026

2. Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Special Government Pleader (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent.

3. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand under the impugned order as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re- consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfillment of the above condition, the bank attachment, if any, relating to the impugned order shall stand raised.

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 01.10.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi

( Uploaded on: 05/10/2026 02:36:18 pm )

WP No. 38088 of 2026

To The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Cholavaram Assessment Circle, Room No.109, 1st Floor, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, Elephant Gate, Wall Tax Road, Chennai-600 003

( Uploaded on: 05/10/2026 02:36:18 pm )

WP No. 38088 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mmi WP No. 38088 of 2026 01.10.2026

( Uploaded on: 05/10/2026 02:36:18 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead