Madras High Court

WP/38220/2026 of Tvl.D.DURAI Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1 on 1 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 38220 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01.10.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 38220 of 2026

and W.M.P. Nos.42933 and 42934 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012114202026}

Tvl.D.Durai

Contractor

GSTIN 33A0ZPD3124R2ZE

236 N/1, Nethaji Road,Tiruvarur – 610 001.

..Petitioner

Vs

The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1

Tiruvarur Assessment Circle,

Commercial Taxes Buildings, Tiruvarur.

..Respondent

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent in GSTIN 33AQZPD3124R2ZE/2021- 22 bearing Reference No. ZD331025275582I dated 25.10.2025 for the assessment year 2021-22 passed by the Respondent under Section 73 of TNGST Act 2017 and to quash the same as cryptic, non-speaking, illegal, arbitrary, wholly without jurisdiction and direct the respondent to pass assessment order.

For Petitioner:

Ms.L.Sweety

for Mr.Sudalai Muthu N

For Respondent:

Ms.G.Dhana Madhri,

Special Government Pleader (Tax)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order dated 25.10.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits.

( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 04:39:29 pm )

WP No. 38220 of 2026

2. Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Special Government Pleader (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent.

3. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand under the impugned order as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re- consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfillment of the above condition, the bank attachment relating to the impugned order shall stand raised.

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 01.10.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi

( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 04:39:29 pm )

WP No. 38220 of 2026

To The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1 Tiruvarur Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Buildings, Tiruvarur.

( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 04:39:29 pm )

WP No. 38220 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mmi WP No. 38220 of 2026 01.10.2026

( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 04:39:29 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead