Madras High Court

WP/38324/2026 of T.Vishnupriya Vs The Tahsildar on 1 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 38324 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

WP No. 38324 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA012166942026}

T.Vishnupriya

S/o Tamilselvan,

No 991, Melavasal Raod,

Melavasal, Pangudi, Sanallur via,

Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvaruru 609 504

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Tahsildar

Nannilam Taluk,

Thiruvaruru district 610 105

2. The Village Administrative officer

Panagudi Village,

Nannilam Taluk,

Thiruvaruru district 610 105

3. The Firka Surveyor

Panagudi Village,

nannilam Taluk,

Thiruvaruru District 610 105

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to survey, fix four boundaries and erect boundary stones for the land comprised in survey No 98, Sub division No. 2 Panagudi Village, Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvaruru District admeasuring an extent of 1.77.50 Ares as per Settlement Deed registered as Document No. 2740 of 2025 on the file of the sub Registrar of Nannilam dated 18.9.2025 within a time frame to be fixe by this Honble Court

WP No. 38324 of 2026

For Petitioner(s):

Ms.S.Deepa

For Respondent(s):

Mr.P.Elayaraj Kumar, Special Government Pleader

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to conduct survey and fix boundaries of the petitioner’s property by considering his representation.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the property comprised in S.F.No. 98, Sub- Division No. 2, situated at Panangudi Village, Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvarur District, admeasuring an extent of 1.77.50 ares, having acquired the same through a registered Settlement Deed dated 18.09.2025. In order to survey the property, the petitioner submitted an online application on 03.08.2026. Since the said application has not been considered to date, the petitioner has approached this Court.

3. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the respondents had visited the land for conducting a survey on 30.09.2026, but due to water stagnation and thick bushes, they were not in a position to complete it. Hence, once the bushes are removed, a proper survey will be conducted. The petitioner may therefore be directed to remove all the bushes on the land and keep it clean so as to enable the respondents to conduct

WP No. 38324 of 2026

the survey, after which the petitioner can very well make a fresh application. In such a case, the respondents will survey and demarcate the petitioner’s land based on the fresh application.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, and perused the materials available on record.

5. Considering the submissions made by both parties and the limited prayer sought for in this writ petition, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the petitioner’s application dated 03.08.2026 and complete the survey within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the same, after issuing prior notice and affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and all other parties concerned. If any need arises for police assistance, it is open to the respondents to seek protection from the jurisdictional police. On such a request being made, the jurisdictional police is directed to provide adequate police protection to facilitate the survey.

6. On the scheduled date of the survey, the petitioner shall clear the bushes on the property in the presence of the official respondents and the jurisdictional police officials to enable the authorities to conduct the survey.

WP No. 38324 of 2026

Thereafter, the official respondents shall complete the survey and demarcate the subject property in accordance with law.

7. In the event of any dispute regarding possession, the official respondents shall not adjudicate upon the question of title. The petitioner and the concerned parties are at liberty to approach the competent Civil Court for recovery of possession and for appropriate reliefs in accordance with law. The official respondents shall not involve themselves in such proceedings or take any action affecting the rights of the parties unless specifically directed by a competent Civil Court.

8. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 01-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SK To

1. The Tahsildar Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvaruru district 610 105

2. The Village Administrative officer Panagudi Village, Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvaruru district 610 105

3. The Firka Surveyor Panagudi Village, nannilam Taluk, Thiruvaruru District 610 105

WP No. 38324 of 2026

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. SK WP No. 38324 of 2026 01-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead