Madras High Court

WP/40045/2026 of A.Jaya Vs The Tahsildar on 1 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 40045 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

WP No. 40045 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA012371202026}

A.Jaya,

W/o.(late) Devadoss,

..Petitioner

Vs

1. The Tahsildar

Thiruvallur District.

2. The Village Administrative Officer/

Ekkadu Kandigai, Thiruvallur Taluk,

Thiruvallur District.

..Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to hold an enquiry in respect of the land comprised in Survey No.111/18, Ekkadu Kandigai, Thiruvallur Taluk and Thiruvallur District besides issuance of patta in pursuant to the application No.54 dated 02.06.2026.

For Petitioner:

Mr.V.Parthiban

For Respondents:

Ms.R.K.Varshini,

Government Advocate

WP No. 40045 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to hold an enquiry in respect of the subject land.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a widow and has been in continuous, uninterrupted possession of Grama Natham land measuring 0.02.00 Hectares in Survey No. 111/18 at Ekkadu Kandigai, Thiruvallur District, for over 30 years, where she has put up a dwelling hut. The petitioner submitted an application dated 02.06.2026 to the first respondent (The Tahsildar, Thiruvallur) enclosing all necessary documents for the issuance of a house site patta. However, despite multiple subsequent requests, the respondents have failed to act upon her representation, thereby compelling the petitioner to file the present Writ Petition.

3. The learned Government Advocate, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents would submit that the petitioner’s application dated 02.06.2026will be disposed of by the respondents within a period of eight weeks.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents and also perused the materials available on record.

WP No. 40045 of 2026

5. In view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the petitioner’s application dated 02.06.2026 on its own merits and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 01-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SK To

1. The Tahsildar

2. The Village Administrative Officer/ Ekkadu Kandigai, Thiruvallur Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

WP No. 40045 of 2026

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. SK WP No. 40045 of 2026 01-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead