Madras High Court

WP CRL.(MD)/5474/2026 of Hari Prakash Vs The Commissioner of Police on 1 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5474 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 01-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5474 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011385682026}

1. Hari Prakash

S/o Rajendran,

Door No.6/44, Puthu Colony,

Arunachalam Cross Street,

S.S. Colony, Madurai City.

2. Hari Prasath

S/o Rajendran,

Door No.6/44, Puthu Colony,

Arunachalam Cross Street,

S.S. Colony, Madurai City.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Commissioner of Police

Office of the Commissioner of Police,

Madurai City.

2. The State of Tamil Nadu rep by

The Inspector of Police

Avaniyapuram Police Station,

Madurai City.

..Respondent(s)

To issue writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner for peacefully cleaning the property and putting up compound wall in Survey No.135/B3 to the extent of 1 acre situated at opposite MGR Nagar, Madurai, Avaniyapuram, Airport Bypass Road, Madurai City, and to take appropriate action in accordance with law against the persons who are unlawfully interfering

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5474 of 2026

with petitioner's and petitioner's brother peaceful possession and threatening the petitioner by considering the petitioner's representation dated 16.08.2026 and 22.09.2026 within time frame as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.K.Palmurugan

For Respondent(s):

Mr.D.Rajaboopathy

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to conduct an enquiry and dispose petitioner’s complaint/representation dated 22.09.2026.

2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner's complaint/representation may be disposed of by the respondents.

4. This Court, without going into the merits of the case, directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's complaint/representation dated 22.09.2026, after affording an opportunity of hearing to both sides,

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5474 of 2026

and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 01-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No TM To

1. The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

2. The State of Tamil Nadu rep by The Inspector of Police Avaniyapuram Police Station, Madurai City.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5474 of 2026

DR.P.MURUGAN, J. TM WP Crl.(MD) No. 5474 of 2026 01-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead