Madras High Court
CRP/512/2026 of B.V.A.Sekar Vs M.Anguraj on 30 September 2026
CRP No. 512 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
CRP No. 512 of 2026
and CMP. No.2754 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA010253752026}
Mr.B.V.A.Sekar
S/O. Late B.V Arumugham Chettiar,
Flat no.A-1, First Floor Green Meadows,
D.No.2/4, Cathedral Garden Lane,
Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600034.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. Mr.M.Anguraj
S/O. Late. B.V.A. Manohar,
New NO.32, Old Door No.19,
Boo Begum 3rd Street,
Anna Salai, Chennai - 600002.
2. Mrs.Mahalakshmi
D/o.Late BVA Manohar and W/o.S.Sabarigiri, No.13/104 CVG Park Road, Gudur SCSR, Nellore Jilla, Andhra Pradesh 524101.
3. Mrs.M. Dhanalakshmi
W/o.Late B.V.A.Manohar,
New No.32, Old D.No. 19,
Boo Begum 3rd St, Anna Salai, Chennai 2
4. Mr.B.V.A.Ganesh
S/o.late B.V.Arumugham Chettiar,
No.15 Boobegum 4th St, 2nd Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai 2.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order 06.01.2026 passed in IA.No.9 of 2025 in O.S.No. 7577 of 2019 by the learned XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai.
CRP No. 512 of 2026
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.SK.Rahul Vivek
For Respondent(s):
Mr.V.Ramesh for
Mr. R.Ashwanth for R1 to R3
No Appearance for R4
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard Mr.SK.Rahul Vivek, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Mr.Ramesh, for Mr.R.Ashwanth, learned counsel for the contesting respondents 1 to 3.
2. The parties are admittedly brothers and the present application has been filed challenging the appointment of a second Advocate Commissioner. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, on earlier occasion, I had suggested that the parties being brothers could amicably resolve the disputes among themselves, especially considering the nature and extent of the property, though it was proposed by the respondents that they would be interested in retaining the entire premises and buy out the share of the petitioner, the settlement talks in that direction have not gained any steam.
3. Today, however, the learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the petitioner and the respondents are agreeable for the property to be sold under the supervision of an Advocate Commissioner to be appointed by this Court, in a time bound manner. The learned counsel also make a further request that the Advocate Commissioner shall file a valuation report and an upset price shall fix by the Trial Court within a month from the date of uploading of copy
CRP No. 512 of 2026
of the order and a right of refusal shall be given to both parties, to meet the said offer, so that the properties can be retained within the family.
4. In the event of both parties by not willing or unable to meet the upset price that is fixed based on the assessment of the value of the property by the Advocate Commissioner, then the Court shall take steps to sell the property in public auction, so that the net moiety shall be divided equally. I hereby appoint Mrs.J.Jyothi, Advocate (Cell: 99412 77442) as an Advocate Commissioner, having address at 291, New Additional Law Chambers, to inspect the property, obtain a report from the licensed Surveyor. The parties shall pay Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the Advocate Commissioner as initial remuneration.
5. This Court directs the Commissioner to carry out the inspection with the assistance of a registered Valuer/Surveyor and file a report and sought an upset price within a period of four (4) weeks, based on which the Trial Court shall take such further steps keeping in mind the directions in Paragraphs No.3 and 4 herein above.
5. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed. No costs. 30-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKP
CRP No. 512 of 2026
P.B.BALAJI, J. RKP To The XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai. CRP No. 512 of 2026 and CMP. No.2754 of 2026 30-09-2026