Madras High Court

WA/3045/2026 of The Joint Commissioner /Executive Officer Vs K.Subramanian on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WA No. 3045 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNASWAMY GOVINDARAJAN

WA No. 3045 of 2026

and

CMP Nos.26899 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA011532682026}

The Joint Commissioner /Executive Officer Arulmigu Devi Karumariamman Thiru Kovil, Tiruverkadu,

Chennai 600 077.

..Appellant(s)

Vs

1. K.Subramanian

2. The Commissioner

HR and CE Department,

Mahatma Gandhi road,

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow the above Writ Appeal to set aside the order dated 25.03.2026 passed in WP

No.10871 of 2026 and allow the above Writ Appeal.

For Appellant(s):

Ms.P.Padmaja

For Respondent(s):

Mr.A.D.JANARTHANAN

FOR R1

MR.R.Bharanidharan

For R2

( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 03:16:44 pm )

WA No. 3045 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Devi Karumariamman Thiru Kovil, filed the present Intra Court appeal challenging the Writ Order dated 25.03.2026, passed in WP No.10871 of 2026.

2. The first respondent filed the writ petition seeking interest for the belated settlement of Gratuity under Rule 45 A of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978. Though the first respondent claims interest under the payment of the Gratuity Act, the said Act would not apply to the Tamil Nadu Government Servants, but they are entitled to claim interest for the belated settlement of Gratuity under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978. Therefore, the first respondent is entitled to get interest as admissible under Rule 45 A of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

3. The learned Single Judge also granted the relief based on Rule 45 A. Thus, this Court finds no infirmity in the order impugned. Consequently, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is directed to settle the interest within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.G.R.,J.) 30-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SLI

( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 03:16:44 pm )

WA No. 3045 of 2026

To The Commissioner HR and CE Department, Mahatma Gandhi road,

( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 03:16:44 pm )

WA No. 3045 of 2026

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND KRISHNASWAMY GOVINDARAJAN, J. SLI WA No. 3045 of 2026 and CMP Nos.26899 of 2026 30-09-2026

( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 03:16:44 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead