Madras High Court

WP/37564/2026 of M/s MLF Traders Vs The Assistant Commissioner ST FAC on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 37564 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 37564 of 2026

and

WMP No.42175 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012115772026}

M/s MLF Traders

Represented by its Proprietor

Fayaz Ahmed Meerlabbai,

First Floor, No. 1088/3, P.J. Nehru Road, Vaniyambadi, Vellore 635 751.

..Petitioner

Vs

The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC),

Vaniyambadi Assessment Circle,

Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Road,

Court complex, Vaniyambadi - 635 751.

..Respondent

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in GSTIN: 33ADEPF1875H1ZS/2021-2022, quash the order dated 15.12.2025 passed therein.

For Petitioner:

Mr. P.V.Sudakar

For Respondent:

Mr. R. Sethu Prabakaran

Government Advocate (Tax)

WP No. 37564 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order dated 15.12.2025 is assailed primarily on the ground that a reasonable opportunity was not provided to the petitioner to submit a reply on merits and to submit supporting documents.

2. Mr. R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Advocate (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within five months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfillment of the above condition, the attachment, if any, of the bank account of the petitioner in relation to the impugned order shall stand raised.

WP No. 37564 of 2026

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 30-09-2026 Index: Yes/No (2/2) Neutral Citation: Yes/No KJ/ARL To The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Vaniyambadi Assessment Circle, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehur Road, Court complex, Vaniyambadi - 635 751

WP No. 37564 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 37564 of 2026 30-09-2026 (2/2)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead