Madras High Court

WP/37954/2026 of National Public School Vs Superintendent of GST and C Excise HPU on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 37954 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.09.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 37954 of 2026

and W.M.P. Nos.42621 and 42622 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012200202026}

M/s. National Public School Citizen

Education Society Represented by its

Chairman Dr.K.P.Gopalakrishnan

No 228, Avvai Shanmugum Road

Chennai – 600 086.

..Petitioner

Vs

Superintendent of GST and C Excise HPU

O/o.The Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Chennai North Commissionerate No.26/1,Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034

..Respondent

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Show Cause Notice No.

GEXCOM/AE/INV/GST/11404/2026 dated 29.08.2026 issued by the Respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioner:

Mr.Amit Anand Deshpande

for M/s.Derrick Sam

For Respondent:

Mr.Su.Srinivasan,

Senior Standing Counsel

Mr.J.Harikrishna,

Junior Standing Counsel

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

A show cause notice dated 29.08.2026 is assailed primarily on the ground that such notice pertains to multiple assessment periods.

WP No. 37954 of 2026

2. Mr.Su.Srinivasan, learned Senior Standing Counsel and Mr.J.Harikrishna, learned Junior Standing Counsel, accept notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. A Division Bench of this Court is currently examining whether a common assessment can be made in relation to multiple assessment periods. Pending decision of the Division Bench, wherever similar contention was raised, limited protection against recovery was granted. Therefore, the petitioner may respond to the show cause notice and the respondent may conclude the adjudication. Until the Division Bench decides the legal issue, no recovery measures pursuant thereto shall be taken by the respondent. All contentions are left open to the petitioner.

4. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 30.09.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi To The Superintendent of GST and C Excise HPU O/o.The Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Chennai North Commissionerate No.26/1,Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034

WP No. 37954 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mmi WP No. 37954 of 2026 30.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead