Madras High Court
WP/38246/2026 of Kasiyammal Vs The District collector on 30 September 2026
WP No. 38246 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
WP No. 38246 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA012147172026}
Kasiyammal
W/o. Raja Manickam,
Mariamman Koil Street,
Seelapanthal village,
Tiruvannamalai Taluk,
Tiruvannamalai District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The District collector
collectorate Office,
Tiruvannamalai ,
Tiruvannamalai District.
2. the Revenue Divisional Officer
Revenue Divisional Office,
Tiruvannamalai
3. The Tashsildar
Tiruvannamalai Taluk Office,
Tiruvannamalai
Tiruvannamalai District.
..Respondent(s)
Prayer:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Mandamus, directing the 3rd Respondent viz., the Tahsildar Tiruvannamalai Taluk Office, Tiruvannamalai to consider petitioner representation dated 02.06.2026 and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to issue rectified FMB in respect of petitioner house site to an extent of 4.5 cents comprised in Natham Survey No.100/5 New Natham Survey No.100/5E as per
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:38 am )
WP No. 38246 of 2026
petitioner sale deed Doc. No.2333/1981 as well as petitioner possession and enjoyment of the said property to petitioner For Petitioner(s):
M/S. D.K.Nepolean
For Respondent(s):
Mr.Bhagavath Krishnan PMN, AGP
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2026.
2. Mr.Bhagavath Krishnan PMN, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.
3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 02.06.2026 before the respondents, requesting them to issue rectified FMB sketch in respect of the subject property. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition.
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:38 am )
WP No. 38246 of 2026
5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 8 weeks. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.
6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.
7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 02.06.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 30-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To
1. The District collector collectorate Office, Tiruvannamalai , Tiruvannamalai District.
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:38 am )
WP No. 38246 of 2026
2. the Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office, Tiruvannamalai
3. The Tashsildar Tiruvannamalai Taluk Office, Tiruvannamalai Tiruvannamalai District.
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:38 am )
WP No. 38246 of 2026
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 38246 of 2026 30-09-2026
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:38 am )