Madras High Court
WP/39294/2026 of G.Saroja Vs The District Collector on 30 September 2026
WP No. 39294 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
WP No. 39294 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA012079312026}
G.Saroja
W/o Ganesan,
Gandhi Nagar,
Chinnathirupathi Post,
Salem Taluk and District 636 008
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The District Collector
Salem, Salem District
2. The Revenue Divisional officer
Salem, Salem District
3. The Tahsildar
Salem,
Salem Taluk and District
4. The Head Surveyor
Salem Taluk,
Salem District
..Respondent(s)
Prayer:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Mandamus, Directing the Respondents herein to rectify the classification of the property in Town Survey Land Register (TSLR) as Ryotwari Punjai in respect of the property in Old Survey No 260/1B and New Survey No 260/16 which having an extent of 12.50 Ares situated t Kannankurichi Revenue Village, Salem Taluk and District on the basis of the Petitioners, representation dated 24.03.2026 within a reasonable time that may be fixed by this Honble Court
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:39 am )
WP No. 39294 of 2026
For Petitioner(s):
Ms.A. Tamizhi
For Respondent(s):
Mr.Bhagavath Krishnan PMN, AGP
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.03.2026.
2. Mr.Bhagavath Krishnan PMN, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.
3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 24.03.2026 before the respondents, requesting them to rectify the classification of the subject land in TSLR as “Ryotwari Punjai”. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition.
5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 6 weeks. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:39 am )
WP No. 39294 of 2026
6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.
7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24.03.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 30-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To
1. The District Collector Salem, Salem District
2. The Revenue Divisional officer Salem, Salem District
3. The Tahsildar Salem, Salem Taluk and District
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:39 am )
WP No. 39294 of 2026
4. The Head Surveyor Salem Taluk, Salem District
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:39 am )
WP No. 39294 of 2026
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 39294 of 2026 30-09-2026
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:39 am )