Madras High Court

WP/39965/2026 of Dasarathan Vs The District Revenue officer on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 39965 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

WP No. 39965 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA012370722026}

Dasarathan,

S/O.Late.Kaveri

D.No.1/52

Pachanampatti Mel Theru

Kadagathur Taluk

Dharmapuri District

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Revenue officer

office of the district Revenue officer

Dharmapuri District

2. The Revenue Divisional officer

Office of the Revenue Divisional officer Dharmapuri District

3. The Thasildar

Dharmapuri

Dharmapuri District

4. Subramani

S/o.Late.Chinnamadhaiyan

Pachanampatti Mel Theru

Kadagathur Taluk

Dharmapuri District

..Respondent(s)

Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 25.8.2026

WP No. 39965 of 2026

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.V.Sakkarapani

For Respondent(s):

Ms.R.K.Varshini, GA for R1 to 3

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25.08.2026.

2. Ms.R.K.Varshini, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3.

3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 25.08.2026 before the respondents, requesting them to cancel the patta issued in favour of the 4th respondent. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition.

5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 6 weeks. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

WP No. 39965 of 2026

6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25.08.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 30-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To

1. The District Revenue officer office of the district Revenue officer Dharmapuri District

2. The Revenue Divisional officer Office of the Revenue Divisional officer Dharmapuri District

3. The Thasildar Dharmapuri Dharmapuri District

WP No. 39965 of 2026

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 39965 of 2026 30-09-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead