Central Administrative Tribunal
PM Ramesan vs DEFENCE on 14 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM Order Sheet Item no.: 30 O.A./28/2026 (ERNAKULAM) [ PENSION ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 8 Order Dated: 14/10/2026 PM RAMESAN Vs DEFENCE For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Ashok B. Shenoy For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. M.K. Padmanabhan Nair, ACGSC Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal
MA/984/2026 (for impleading) This is an application for impleading NSDL as the additional 5th respondent. Learned Standing Counsel for R-1 to 4 has no objection. Heard. MA is allowed. NSDL represented by its Mananging Director is impleaded as additional 5th respondent. Issue notice to the additional 5th respondent by speed post, returnable by 20.11.2026. List on 20.11.2026. BRAJ MOHAN AGRAWAL MEMBER (A) JUSTICE K HARIPAL MEMBER (J) A X ( steno 'c' )
Case No O.A./28/2026 Ernakulam Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 30 Generated by Sherin A.X CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench on 14/10/2026
2026.10.14 17:13:15+05'30' A X Sherin