Madras High Court
WP/40002/2026 of N.Manickam Vs THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER on 30 September 2026
WP No. 40002 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
WP No. 40002 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA012345622026}
N.Manickam
S/o. Natesagounder,
Erumampatti village,
Paleguli post,
Pochampalli Taluk,
Krishnagiri district
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The District Revenue Officer
Krishnagiri district Krishnagiri
2. The Revenue Divisional officer
Krishnagiri , Krishnagiri district
3. The Tahsildar
Krishnagiri district
4. Kuber
S/o. Purushothaman,
Erumampatti village,
Paleguli post, Pochampalli Taluk,
Krishnagiri district
..Respondent(s)
Prayer:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioners appeal dated 21.11.2025 against the order dated 4.11.2025
passed by the 2nd respondent in P.Mu. No. 117/ 2025 within such time as may be framed by this Honble court and consequently to pass appropriate orders on the petitioners request for deletion of the name of Kuber son of Purushothaman
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:40 am )
WP No. 40002 of 2026
from the relevant revenue records and issuance of a separate patta in the petitioners name in respect of Survey No. 1149/1 in the light of the final judicial orders and the documents produced by petitioner and in accordance with law For Petitioner(s):
Mr.T.Panchatsaram
For Respondent(s):
Mr.P.Elayaraj Kumar, SGP for R1 to 3
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's appeal dated 21.11.2025.
2. Mr.P.Elayaraj Kumar, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3.
3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed an appeal dated 21.11.2025 before the 1st respondent against the rejection order dated 04.11.2025 passed by the 2nd respondent. However, the said appeal was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition.
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:40 am )
WP No. 40002 of 2026
5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s appeal will be disposed of within a period of 10 weeks. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.
6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.
7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider the appeal filed by the petitioner dated 21.11.2025 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 10 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 30-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To
1. The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri district Krishnagiri
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:40 am )
WP No. 40002 of 2026
2. The Revenue Divisional officer Krishnagiri , Krishnagiri district
3. The Tahsildar Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri district
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:40 am )
WP No. 40002 of 2026
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 40002 of 2026 30-09-2026
( Uploaded on: 07/10/2026 11:54:40 am )