Central Administrative Tribunal
MANIYAMMA vs NORTHERN RAILWAY on 13 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM Order Sheet Item no.: 27 O.A./409/2025 (ERNAKULAM) [ FAMILY PENSION ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 12 Order Dated: 13/10/2026 MANIYAMMA Vs NORTHERN RAILWAY For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. T.C. Govindaswamy For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Anil Prasad, ACGSC, Ms. Bindumol Joseph, Ms. C.P. Gopika Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal It is submitted by the learned ACGSC that essentially two issues arose regarding the implementation. One was regarding the difference in name of the person concerned, as shown in the PAN card and Aadhar Card. Regarding it, one and the same certificate is produced by the applicant herein. Secondly, regarding the name in Aadhar card and PAN card. It is submitted by the learned ACGSC that the date of birth does not tally with each other. We are inclined to direct that if the entry in any of the PAN card or Aadhar card tally with the record available with the Railways, that date shall be relied on and process accordingly. For reporting full compliance, list on 19.11.2026. V RAMA MATHEW MEMBER (A) JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS MEMBER (J) A X ( steno 'c' )
Case No O.A./409/2025 Ernakulam Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 27 Generated by Sherin A.X CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench on 13/10/2026
2026.10.14 17:02:59+05'30' A X Sherin