Madras High Court

WP(MD)/28372/2026 of V.Krishnasamy Vs The Revenue District Officer on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 28372 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 30-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

AND

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

WP(MD) No. 28372 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011307062026}

V.Krishnasamy

S/o. Veerappan,

14, Vadakipatti,

Mela Thaniyam(PO),

Ponnamaravathi Taluk,

Pudukottai District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Revenue District Officer,

Revenue District Office,

Illupur.

2. The Tahsildar,

Tahsildar Office,

Ponnamaravathi Taluk,

Pudukottai District.

3. The Block Development Officer,

Block Development Office,

Ponnamaravathi Taluk,

Pudukottai District.

4. A.Durai,

S/o.Arumugam,

2/15A, Alampatti,

Keelathaniyam (PO), Karaiyur (via),

Ponnamaravathi Taluk,

Pudukottai District.

..Respondent(s)

WP(MD) No. 28372 of 2026

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to remove the encroachment made by the 4th respondent in water body in Survey No.251/5, Karaiyur Village, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukottai District consisting of 0.10.00 hecters on the basis of the petitioner’s representation dated 23.12.2025 and letter dated Na.Ka.No.1796/2026/Aa2 dated 8/06/2026 forwarded by the 2nd respondent to 3rd respondent within the stipulated time period fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.K.Gokul

For Respondent(s):

Ms.W.Pamelin,

Additional Government Pleader

for R-1 & R-2.

Ms.M.D.Devi Saravana Priya,

Additional Government Pleader

for R-3.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to

3.

2. Issuance of notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with.

3. The writ petitioner is a resident of Ponnamaravathi Taluk. He

WP(MD) No. 28372 of 2026

alleges that in survey No.251/5, Karaiyur Village, there are encroachments. In fact, the authorities concede the said position.

4. We direct the respondents 2 and 3 to take effect steps to ensure that the petition mentioned encroachments are totally removed. We grant them two months from today to carry out this exercise. This writ petition stands allowed accordingly. No costs. (G.R.S.,J.) (B.P.,J.) 30-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PMU To

1. The Revenue District Officer, Revenue District Office, Illupur.

2. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

3. The Block Development Officer, Block Development Office, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

WP(MD) No. 28372 of 2026

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND B.PUGALENDHI, J. PMU WP(MD) No. 28372 of 2026 30-09-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead