Madras High Court
CRL RC/1953/2026 of P.Soundararajan Vs The Sub Divisional Cum Revenue on 29 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
CRL RC No. 1953 of 2026 and
Crl.MP.No.16420 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA012021362026}
P.Soundararajan
..Petitioner
Vs
1. The Sub-Divisional Cum Revenue,
Divisional Officer,
Udumalpettai.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Udumalpet Police Station,
Udumalpet,Tiruppur District.
3. Thiru. A. Palanisamy
4. P. Ravikumar
5. A. Nataraj
6. G. Kalyana Murugan
..Respondent(s)
Prayer : Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 438(1) of BNSS, 2023
praying to call for the records relating to the 1st Respondent order made in Na.Ka.No.1840/2026/A2 dated 16-07-2026 to set aside and to pass such other further or other order as this Honorable Court.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.L.Chandrakumar
For Respondent(s):
Mr.A.Amarnath,
Additional Public Prosecutor [for R1 & R2]
Mr.R.Viduthalai, Senior Counsel
for Ms. R.Revathy [for R3 to R6]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The order impugned in this revision is dated 16.07.2026 by which the first respondent had directed the petitioner as well as “B” party (respondents 3 to 6) not to act in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of law and order.
( Uploaded on: 05/10/2026 01:53:12 pm )
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the impugned order was passed without any notice to him since the address of the petitioner was shown as No.4/42, 6th Avenue, Ashok nagar, Chennai Vallagundapuram, Udumalpettai and the notice was attempted to be sent to Udumalpettai and that therefore, without hearing the petitioner, the impugned order was passed.
3. The petitioner is justified to the extent of stating that the impugned order was passed without any notice to him. However, this Court is of the view that the impugned order is innocuous in as much as it states that both A & B parties shall not act in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of law and order. The impugned order has not decided on the rights of the parties. Therefore, no interference is called for in the impugned order. However, the impugned order would not have any bearing on the claims of the parties before any other forum.
4. With the above observations, the criminal revision case stands dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 29-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No NR/NM
( Uploaded on: 05/10/2026 01:53:12 pm )
To
1. The Sub-Divisional Cum Revenue, Divisional Officer, Udumalpettai.
2. The Inspector of Police, Udumalpet Police Station, Udumalpet, Tiruppur District.
( Uploaded on: 05/10/2026 01:53:12 pm )
SUNDER MOHAN, J. NR CRL RC No. 1953 of 2026 and Crl.MP.No.16420 of 2026 29-09-2026
( Uploaded on: 05/10/2026 01:53:12 pm )