Madras High Court

WP/37492/2026 of MCB Granite and Exports Pvt Ltd Vs State Tax Officer / Commercial Tax Officer on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 37492 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29.09.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP No. 37492 of 2026

and W.M.P. Nos.42105 and 42107 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012117832026}

MCB Granite and Exports Pvt Ltd

Represented by its Director S.Srivignesh SF No.79, Naduvanapalli, Veppanapalli, Krishnagiri, Tamilnadu-635 121.

..Petitioner

Vs

State Tax Officer / Commercial Tax Officer Krishnagiri- I Circle, Krishnagiri, Hosur, Tamil Nadu.

..Respondent

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the entire records relating to the impugned adjudication order in Reference No.

ZD330326226067M dated 25.03.2026 along with detailed annexure in GSTIN 33AAJCM8393G2Z3/ 2019-20 dated 25.03.2026 passed by the Respondent read with rectification order in Reference No.ZD330326227547D dated 25.03.2026 along with detailed annexure in GSTIN33AAJCM8393G2Z3/2019-20 dated 25.03.2026 passed by the Respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioner:

Ms.R.Sri Visvapriya

For Respondent:

Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran,

Additional Government Pleader (Tax)

WP No. 37492 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order in original imposing tax under applicable GST statutes on the seigniorage/royalty fees payable to the Government of Tamil Nadu is under challenge.

2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Additional Government Pleader (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. In substantially similar circumstances, this Court, in order dated 30.01.2026 in W.P.No.2921 of 2026, set aside a similar order on condition that 10% of the disputed tax be paid by the petitioner. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 10% of the disputed tax and has made an endorsement on the bundle to that effect.

4. Subject to fulfillment of the above condition, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the original authority. Any order issued pursuant to such remand shall be kept in abeyance and not implemented until receipt of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in S.L.P.No.37326 of 2017.

WP No. 37492 of 2026

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 29.09.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi To The State Tax Officer / Commercial Tax Officer Krishnagiri- I Circle, Krishnagiri, Hosur, Tamil Nadu.

WP No. 37492 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mmi WP No. 37492 of 2026 29.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead